pf_01654 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

POINTE DEVELOPMENT COFZPORATIUN, CASE 1654 A. Ei. C. u, Buildinq Location Page 2 One of the benefits of the revised plan is a significant increase in the setbacks on the residential properties to the south and to the structure. The three story structure was located 76 feet from the south property line in the original proposal. This distance is now increased to 125 feet. On the west, the original structure was located the minimum of 30 feet from the west property line which is the City park. In the new proposal, this distance is increased to 155 feet. These distances are sliown as they relate to the old end the new site plan on the second sheet of the applicant's set of drawings. Duildinq Heiqht That portion of the struc¢ure nearest the south property line, which is the back yard of the contiguous residential lots fronting on the north side of Drooks Avenue, is now proposed to be four stories. The height of this structure to the top of the parapet 3s 40 feet as indicated in the section in drawing 3. The revised structure, however, will not have a gabted roof and, ti�us, is relatively closQ to the former height of the thre� story stcucture. The remainder of th� new structure, located approximetoly in the center of the site, is proposed to be six starres high. '�ou will note from the e�xamination of the section on sheet 3 thet being setback f�rther to the north, the line of site from the aingle-family realdence to the aouth is very neerly thet of the four story structure. Due to the signlflcant Incraase to the aetback frar� these reaidences, the visu�l impact of the change woutd a�ppear to be rQlatively rninar. Parkinq The n�w proposal wi;l have Chree more units than the previoua design, there boIng a totel of 215 unl ts cu�rrently praposed. Perking wil! be reduced from 213 spaces to 204. This produces a parking retlo af .95 spaces per dwelling unit. The previous proposa! was �t 1.1 perking s�aces pQr unit. Yo� may recall th�t t�oth of the first two senior ciCizen projecCs in I�os�ville fi�d parking ratios significently 1Qss• The experienca of [he Eberiezer people in de�elopments of this type indicate a meximum need of .8 parking apac�s per unit. Ivlost imporCently, there are still X58 parking apaces to be provided in the lower level of the structure. The original proposal contained 160. Though the origir�al structure had a mucli larger foo[prin[, underground parking did not extend tl�rouyhout the entire � structure. We suoqest tf�at the parking ratio proposed is not a problem. �loor Ar�a Ratio The floor area ratiu described in the This means that the ratio of total floor floocs �ut not the parkin J ra�np) �o th� R-3 district is .S. space {countiny nll tc�tal area of the