Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />�os���; nt-P �n., <br />art�t �S Rrir� �.r�� <br />,�� <br />Attached is a memorandum discu�sing the issue r�latin <br />Rose�ointe ���all. Essentially, the wa1.1 c�eL�ictecl on thego �� ��� <br />plan was simpl.y a concept, and had no� been formall ���rlgi�al <br />cit the rinal plans were for;nulated, the buildin insp �1o�`d. <br />y planner did not notice that the wall, whicn had sub� �� Ue anc� <br />b�en apProved, was not constructec] of bricl; . q n�ly <br />correspondence from Apri1 17, 1g�6 d�,�• �s t he <br />sZ�ecial condition. �i���. th� brick wall tvas a <br />The develop�r <br />does meet the <br />bet4�een city <br />decided that <br />landscaping, <br />Council. This <br />is maintaining that the e�a11, as it is constructed <br />intent of the special conc]ition. ' <br />staff, the develo�er and �h� architect '�eeting <br />a formali.zed plan for the wall includin1� Was <br />c,�ould be developed ancl pr�sent�d to th�g C��y <br />plan is attached, <br />The Council, has three options relating to �his si�ua�.` <br />ioii . <br />1• ��ia{ce an interpretation that the res�ective co <br />been pro�erly ne�, ndition has <br />2. Request a varianc� to th� Sp�cial conditior., <br />3• Require brick facing on the wall. <br />Scaff would li'c� to poin� out that if this wail ' <br />acceptable bric�, it would be extremely important for the Ci <br />develon neco design s�andards which c�ould ls deemed <br />proper standara, for bricic� �� used �o determine <br />�;_ - <br />�. ---- - , o <br />, <, � <br />