My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01654
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1600-1699
>
pf_01654
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2016 2:11:13 PM
Creation date
1/27/2016 2:24:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1654
Planning Files - Type
Special Use Permit
Address
2545 Hamline Ave N
Project Name
Rosepointe
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />. � <br />FREDERICK BENTZ � MILO THOMPSON � F�pgERT RIETOV�/ INC <br />Mr. 8 Mrs. Clyde McLean <br />February 15, 1988 <br />Page Two <br />2. Our design intentions for the landscape wail were several. Firstly, <br />we attempted to address concerns you raised in the City Planning <br />meeting held on October 2� 1985. At that time, the City instructed <br />us to provide only one access point into the site, adjacent to y���r <br />property and to also eventually abandon th� driveway and free- <br />standing garages located at the southeast corner of the project. <br />You, in turn, expressed concern over that decisinn and raised <br />questions as to the impact of fihat traffic flow going past your <br />house. We consequently added return segments of landscape wall <br />flanking ��oth sides of the entry drive to better provided a buffer <br />between your house and the drive. <br />Secondly� after great concern was expressed by both the City and <br />Pointe's marketing staff on the negative appearance of the Forum <br />Apartment and its free-standing garages� a decision was reached <br />to construct the wall to a he�ynt of 6 teet +o better screen the <br />project from the neighborhood and, in effect, make the existing <br />complex more presentable. <br />You expressed your disagreement with our design and told us 1-hat. <br />in your words, we must be "asinine" for thinking that the land- <br />scape wall could hide the garages and that all we ended up build- <br />ing was a"Berlin Wall". Your feelings are that the averall <br />height of the return legs of the landscape wall should be reduced <br />to such a height that you would be able to see over the wall <br />from inside your home. <br />3. We went on to discuss th� facts that tr►e landscape wall is cur- <br />rently in its rou�hest looking state since final steps such as <br />"washing down" the wal) have not been done and that final grad- <br />ing along the landscape wall needs to be done. <br />Steps recently taken in hop� that we would be addressing some of <br />your and the City's concerns h�ve been �to add additional land- <br />scaping along the Namline Avenue side of the wall that will <br />cr�ate a continuous green hedge along the base of the wall. Ivy <br />has been added to the Forum side of the wall and dogwood hedges <br />have been added behind the p�er elemen+s on either side ofi the <br />main entry drive to give addii�ional landscape detail. <br />We concluded the meeting by informin�� you that we would review the <br />above with our Client andconvey as best we could your feelings on <br />�the landscape wall and that we would contaci� you again if aur <br />Client wishes to take some action on this matter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.