My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_00092
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF001 - PF999
>
01-99
>
pf_00092
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2016 10:32:53 AM
Creation date
2/9/2016 12:35:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />n <br />Case Noa 62-92 <br />Petitioner: tailfred C, Bernfison <br />1656 Ridgewood Lane <br />Sto Paul 13, Minnesota <br />Location: <br />L � <br />April 4, 1962 <br />Southeast corner of Snellin� Avenue service <br />road and Lydia Avenue� <br />Action Request�d : Kezor�ing from "D-1" to "B-2" <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIOIJ <br />lo Mra 3erntson is petitioning f'or the rezoning of Lo�ts 22 and <br />23, alock 1, Roseville Terrace Plat No� 1 frcm "B-1" to 'oB_2►� <br />(Retail Business) for�th� pvrpose of constructin� a pharmacy <br />and a superette (1'om Thumb) building on said proper-ty, <br />2o T�►e plot plan has been submitted by the aPplicant indicatin� <br />the proposed construction of 5,232 square feet of �ross floor <br />area which wou].d normally �roduce arnraxima�tely 39950 square <br />feet of ne t visible space, �lpplying th� parkinp, ratio required <br />in the ordinance, spaces for 46 cars should be provided� <br />The plot plan su�mitted c�esignates 46 parking spaces and the <br />10' bumper strip required alon� the easterly prop�rty line <br />contiguous to the single fa�nily resa.dential development to the <br />�ast �, <br />3�, Other �than tlle �onin�; question itself 9 the only design it�m on <br />the plot plan not meeting the ordinance crite ria anpears to b� <br />the 5' set-�ack for th� parking 31on� the fronta�e and side <br />str�ets wllere�s the ordinance requit�es 3.5° . A,s you all know9 <br />�he 1c�t depth of appr�oximately 140' (147 an the south property <br />line) is not re�arded as a desirable depth for Petaa.l Commercial <br />devel.opment,. It is tha.s depth that c�mplicates the 15 9�:��quirc�-� <br />ment for the park�.np, to the str�et line and is �_nde�dy one of <br />th� reasons why the prvnerty was proposed to be used for "3�1" <br />�ur�oses, <br />40 �lfiere is an exist�n�? den�ist"s ofrice 1�uilding on fhe confi�:ucu� <br />lot to the southo I�� is o�' course y this �ype of use which is <br />�ypical and ap�-.,ropriate for such "8�-1" zoned proper-ty � <br />5 � The strip of lots .from 1�ydia Avenue to �ounty Road C-� was <br />r��oned to "B�1" property under th� 1959 oveY,a11. zonin� <br />program;, It would appea� in that respect that -��le principal <br />reasons for applyin� this zon� to ths �ubj�ct property ���re <br />as follows: <br />a„ The propF�rty is ccntip,uous -to single f�mil}� resi.c�ential. <br />development directly to the �as� aizd thou�h �:he �onin� <br />chan�?e occur� a�: th� r�ar l�t lin�--th� sha3.�ow d��th <br />o� the "I3•v;." property cr�eat�s de���lopmerlt coizd� iions <br />po�enti��ly d�le�erious -�a the s�nRi.e f��r��.-� �,;� A�aFs _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.