|
�
<br />�`k
<br />� #
<br />1 � �. � �.
<br />'�'�.�l.�T ����.�►��,
<br />� . .
<br />��������� ! • •
<br />�� +
<br />� �
<br />� � ��� �� �� � �� ���
<br />� • • �
<br />���� ��� ��� � � �
<br />���
<br />� v� �o��t m�c�ne
<br />�� �
<br />• o
<br />�� �� �
<br />� e
<br />�
<br />�.l.�il� �
<br />���� i • A ��
<br />�
<br />,♦ ♦ �� � � ♦ � �
<br />�� ��
<br />� �� ���
<br />1 � �
<br />....�.� �������� c
<br />���� ����V�����
<br />('�:�n�•.nt�on:ii iurninaires—no m�cter huw
<br />i�,w �h��ir tirat c�1st--can ci,.�c t•cru plenty
<br />rf �cyu h.�v� cu t.�t�r chrm dow-n co u�racie
<br />in. �atta�e ur to new lamps.
<br />�„r s�s uith GE f'"n1i'K;`1)(X)R lumi-
<br />r.a;r�,. The��'rt ,a�,;�ned to stay on the
<br />i��'� n�� matc�r K•hat lamp �levelopments
<br />c� tne :�l,;n;;. l'ou save moner or� �ibte
<br />r;plac�rnc•nt lumin�ires, as w•e1� ys time anc}
<br />troubtr of instailin;; them.
<br />I'ut u� GE E'Ot1'►{ /I�)� I�.�minairCs for
<br />merrury c�xia}-. ('��;;ra�1c tomorrnu� Lo
<br />Lucalox �, Multi-Vapor� , or other iu�-
<br />proved li�;ht saurces just by chan�ing
<br />che E'O�i'R/[�ppR assembiy.
<br />Lumin:aire Iife is greatly extended. Your fM-
<br />: cstmerr� ir prottcted.
<br />Get fuU deta�i:g about GE's exclusive
<br />��`�R/I�OOR luminaires and our "Open=
<br />Dac; Policy" for assembly trade-ins. Con-
<br />cact your GE Sales Engineer, or ��rite
<br />Grner:,l Eleetric Co., Seetian 4bo-o2�
<br />Schenrctady, New York i23os.
<br />������� � /
<br />ELE�TRIC
<br />El�c#rics! Wodd. 3un� 2�. i96i ,
<br />�:�,_ �-;<
<br />- ..- r, ^a7'gw�'::
<br />. cuf».•U�`�'!"
<br />� :� � , .
<br />T :�'4
<br />. � _ ,� lt"�:1 .�1 r
<br />y. .
<br />. . . . �. . . . . F ��I
<br />� . � . � .. . . . ' .
<br />El�c�`ric�� :: �,
<br />�/`7% - � .�
<br />June �6,1967 ; ,;
<br />� �i'�t�/"f C�
<br />� y,. _. .,. �'�"�"�" Gruening said he still expected the ;
<br />��
<br />�a_��,_����—_ D;q �,�, _— LE6END project to be built.
<br />r-- � n TaieuT�Rr The Interior Departmel�t report, on
<br />� �n � ORAI8A6E AREA ���hich Udall based his decision, said
<br />�.,� A M A T D AMSITE � BAMPART that total energy production by Ram-
<br />� r NESERYOIR
<br />/`�P,vE�.--�-�- wo HOPl�ER,DAMSli'E part would be about 30 times the
<br />�--- t,,-.��F�airbanks present total use of potential market
<br />a�
<br />— / N�nona .�o,, � � areas. The study wet�t on to say that
<br />� � ' power rates for Rampart would be
<br />� UPPiR SUSiTNA '° ' ` between four and six n�iills per kwhr
<br />RtVER PRi1JECT� � T°''^- ;�...._; and these were too high to attract
<br />'` aluminum producers to AlaskA. Ti�e
<br />.�� \' o� ` i � - report also ruled out the market �or
<br />__ _�� �� � �,,� ��- � � .� Rampa,t �ower in the Pacific North-
<br />QOD (AMYO� .�W •��� west becluse of the rela iv 1
<br />\� AncAorogt ? PR01 �T a � YUN N-TAIYA t e y high
<br />�j ~/�— �'�^ ��`� `= P o1Ett f generatioa �nd the substantial trans- ,
<br />� �oKeno� �` u `�G Cs. ow `,��; � \.
<br />,� / �< < �o, �..�`� mission costs that woutd be involved. �
<br />� ��r 5�,�.o��"/j � -r--'�-"��./�'�•E '`°0•"°y • The adverse effec�s of ;tAmpart on
<br />¢'� ' ` F ° F q c �,����1_, fish and wildlife were of such si nifi-
<br />,�..- � ���"'�;� �. a g
<br />�� � r o� G� S't q ��Z'���^�a+„�f�,� cance, the report SA1C�� itlilt "if other
<br />factors of concern in the praject were
<br />Alaskan h�rdro posstbilities, with Rampart pian naw scrapped, i�clude sites favorable, there would be tfie ques-
<br />noted by heavy iype. Thermal sites would be near Fairbanks and Anchorage tion as to the appropriateness of Any
<br />recomm�ndation of project authoriza-
<br />tion."
<br />��� ° Udall said that among the a1t�:nA-
<br />�� � t�� ��� tives to Rampart were potential hydro
<br />�� developments on the Susttn� River,
<br />■ Bradley Lake, Lake Grace, and Takutz
<br />�� Greek. In addition, he said', �here
<br />� � rt �O �I�$ are potential thermal developments
<br />� � � near Alaskan
<br />loAd center;.
<br />Th,e report listed these hydro possi-
<br />Sees lack of markets� power markets, and the destruction bilities:
<br />of wildlife. OA proposed 3,200-Mw project in
<br />dar�g�r to wildlif�; The project, which has been dis- southwest Alask� which would involve
<br />cussed for more than a decade, a dam at Miles Canyon and be known
<br />Prop�ses aiterna�ives envisioned a reser-voir with a water as the Yukon-Taiya Tidewater project.
<br />surface area of at�out 10,600 square Estimated busbar cost of power for
<br />The Johnson Administration has de- miles, a maximum length of about this project is between 2.5 and 4
<br />cided against construction of ¢he long 280 miles, and a maximum width of miils per kwhr. Project would require
<br />proposed $2-billion, 5,040-Mw Ram- 80 miles. As proposed by the Arm,y a treaty u•ith Canada;
<br />part hydroelectric project in Alaska. Gorps of Engineers, it would have ❑Ti�e 3,600-Mw Wood Canyon
<br />Instead, the federal government had an installed capacity oi 5,040 project, which would be located at
<br />has announced estahlishment of an M�v and a prime power capa�ity of 4he head of the Capper River Canyon
<br />Alaskan Power Administration and 3,9�4 Mw, w}th 311 annual produc- about 130 miles east of Anchorage
<br />suggested the possibility of developing tion of 34.2 billion kwhr. and have estimated busbar costs of
<br />ather smaller projects in the �9th The Interior L►epartment recom- 2.9 to 3.8 mills per kwhr.
<br />State. meadations for abandoning the proj- ❑'The 1,430-Mw Upper Susitna
<br />Interior Secretary Stewart Udall, ect were sent ta the Army, wluch has River project, which would be half
<br />who announced the Administration's the final respousibility for making a way between Anchora�e and Fair-
<br />decision on th� Ramgart project; said at decision. �ut Udall made it evident banks, And pruvide for development in
<br />a press confer�nce that determination at his press eonfer�nce that his views three stages. Estimated busbar costs
<br />not to ge ahead with the project was were the views of �he Administration, would be 5.2 to 7.Q mills per kwhr.
<br />based on an intensive 5-year study eliminating any douht as to what t�e 'Y'hc report said the most promising
<br />af the project. However, be said, final oatcome will be. opporCunities for development of large
<br />"We are firmly convinced an available Sen Emest Grnening [D-Alaska], a blocks of fassil fuel power to meet
<br />supply of abundani, low-cost �ower former gavernor of Alaska and one predicted power needs of the state
<br />i� �ssential to the future development of the most vocal propanents of ihe were in thc gas fiE�ds of the Cook
<br />of Ataska." Ramgart p�'oject, c�Ytrcized Ud�ll's.an- Iniet area, the Nenana Caal_ ftelds
<br />Princip?e reasans for tuming thumbs nouncer:�nt, suying the Iniercor Secre- near Fairbanks, and the Matanuska `
<br />down on Rampart, �aid Udall, were tary was prejudiced i:z favor of "Eer- and Susitna coal fields near Anchor-
<br />the huge investment costs, the lack oE �ain wildlife preservxtion socieries." age.
<br />;
<br />Electrical Worl4 Jues ss. i9a -. ;; a5 �
<br />; -. _.
<br />_ . , ,
<br />„ .
<br />_ . . .. . '__ . ' .. 'J � �, ih�:' _ ��,t'�r��yir4���7�1��,
<br />
|