Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />� <br />. <br />Case No. 62-89 <br />Petitioner: <br />♦ � y <br />Anthony G. Indykiewicz <br />� � 62 <br />February 7, 9 <br />Location: Southeast of State Si.ghway 8 and Nor�herly of Troseth <br />goad (s�e sketch) <br />Action Requested: Rezonin� from "R-1" to "R-3'� <br />PL�nning Considerations <br />1. The proper�y <br />cor�sista of 4.6 acrea of land �201, 500 sq• �'t •)�n� is <br />naw zoned single family residential• N rth�rneS-te�.tes Powe�Line <br />State Highway 8 on the northwest, The o �n� of <br />easement to the north�ast, and ��rophe$s�riG�o�"'�heU�southw� there are <br />the new State iiighw3Y 8 on the sou <br />geveral parcels ot' ]Bnd gome of which are deve].oped with single fam9.ly <br />homes as in�ic�'ted on the aketch at th� left. <br />_ <br />2. Tt would appear thet it is ihe int�engi Unit" involving thedconst�ruction <br />the property as a Plann� Re�iden i _ ;,�n areas. I� would <br />.__ _ _ pa-_ .__ _. � .-- <br />__ ..__... <br />of numerou� bui.ldi.n� _w�.th_ prl.v�xt� drivewe. s an .. <br />__�--._._.-._ ___._� .. _ . <br />.. <br />� - <br />appear however, that no__�ppl�-cati on f or_ a�proval _ of _ such a_p �n� _ <br />residential unit has been submitted. Thus, th� development plan can <br />-_.__.____ _ . _ <br />__..__ . .. <br />_. <br />___� <br />only be considerec� as an indication of tl�ov�d e of development w c cou <br />be accomplished if the rezonin� were app <br />3, It w�uld appesr irom the aforementionedepl�h�pl��re�t�re�ulQtiona <br />dwelling uriits could be const?"ucted und •�� . o� <br />�5�qp sq. ft. of property p�r tti�ra-bed.room uni�, lai� 9q unit. <br />per one �bedroom unit, and l. 5�z �-n� ��ce� per dwelling <br />4. There are several bmsic queat:i.ons with respect to tizis rezon3.ngo <br />99 <br />requirin� <br />property <br />Q. First].y yau will note on the �1{e��Qt��Aidema jos� t o� ou�hfare <br />propo s e d t o c o n a�: r u c� t a V i l l�� e <br />�nt con�tiguous io the property <br />a d ja cent to the power line easem <br />in queation alon�, �.ts northeas �erluld havexcons der�ble9 effect <br />a tllorau�hfaj'e, if constructed, wo <br />on t,he land in questi on . <br />b. It is also obvious that i�he development o�' the re�alignment <br />��� g�.g�h�,zay 8 pl.uces the property J.n ques�ion in some�,rhat of <br />a di�'ferent circums�Lancc tl�n b�for� such re-�li�ent taas <br />consldered. With �he p�operty to the north�a�st now 2oned <br />"B-2"� and the �'�-���-���nt °� ause�to�co sider�zoningeoth�r <br />there would appear to be �ood c <br />tihan s3.n�le f�.mily for the ar. ea � n qucstion. <br />c. The pg�oper�;y in ques�tion has a peeuliar shape to t71� taesterly <br />�r�a, This ex�ension af the land u�e �multiple� into the <br />s3.n�le fami�.y area ia extremely que3��ioxl�bl.e o We st1��st <br />that at the Comnlission henrin�mthe _a�plican�_b��,uestioned <br />_._�_.........._.�.....__��..�.�. �.._...__�._w.__....�. �. __ _ . .. . .. __ _ _.. _._�.___.._..___..�? �_�? ..-- -. �' _ .._ _ -- --- <br />a:, to whether or no�_ h� c�wn� �d.dltion�l ro �r� _ in the areg <br />__..__._._.�_.._.. _ . <br />��,r�d^«he�h�r or not i� ��e .�'easible to rezone �ro�ert3es <br />._._. . _..,.,_.__. -- <br />_____.____ _— <br />contiguous to �hia odd ah�.pe ex�ension for mul�iple fami_y <br />