Laserfiche WebLink
' � <br />u <br />� <br />�J <br />August 6, 1969 <br />CAS E NO: <br />A PPL ICA NT : <br />LOCATION: <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />� <br />531-69 <br />Mid America Bancorporation <br />Northeast corner of Fairview Avenue and County Road 13-2 <br />Approval of Variar�ces to Setback <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />1. The property in question is zoned Shopping Center Districfiwhich provides <br />for a 100 foot setback when contiguous to the single family zone as is the <br />case he�•e. The property is proposed to be used for a new bank structure <br />for which a charter has recently beeri approved by the controller of the <br />currency. The bank is a permitted use in the shopping center districfi, but <br />the applicant requests the approval of the vc�riances so as to be abl� to <br />construct the building on the siteo <br />2. The applicant proposes to locate the building 80 feet from th� north <br />property line which is a rear (ot line of homes fronting on Bruce ,4venue <br />to the north. The structure would be 30 feet from Fairview Avenue and <br />some 80 feet from the nearest point on Counfiy Road B-2, Thus, most <br />of the traffic ingress and egress is oriented toward the shopping center <br />with the corner being developed primarily for landscaping. The building <br />as located should function well as a g4teway to the shopping center, <br />with a considerable area on the corner left open for purposes of line ot si:ght <br />for traffic at the intersection. <br />3. The applicanfi proposes to retain 10 feet of screer�ing along the north side <br />contiguous to the driveways leading to the drive-up teller window units. <br />Four of such tel ler units are proposed the nearest of which would be 40 <br />feet from the property line to the north. All the proposed setbacks with <br />respect to pqrking and buildings conform to or exceed the requirements <br />of the normal 8-1, B-2 or B-3 district. The most important question is <br />that of the handling of the 10 feet contiguous to the single family homes <br />on the north side. Here we suggest the commission and council make <br />certain that adequate screen is provided as required in the ordinance <br />so as to protect the environment to the single family homes to the north. <br />� <br />:3 <br />