Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />� <br />July ?, 1969 <br />rA5 E Nd : <br />I�PPLiCANT: <br />LOCA�(!n N: <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />� <br />527-6� <br />Ramsey �ounty <br />Larpenteur to Trunk Higi�way 36 <br />Approval of Plans for Improvement of Lexington <br />Avenue from T►•unk Higl�way 36 to Larpenteur �lvenue <br />PLANNING CC�NSIDERATIOI�IS: <br />1. �; copy of a memo to fihe Vilfage M�anager from the Public Wor�s Director <br />is ati�ached inciicating th� Public Works Dire�tor's general •ccommendations <br />regar_iing the improvernent proposal . As noted in the me7-o; plans are very <br />preliminary in nature. <br />2. In general, wn �gree with the concept of impr�ving Lexington Avenue �rior <br />to its being turned over to the CQuntye It, however, suc{� im��rovements <br />require considerable investment on the part of the Village, we sl�ould be <br />extremely careful to ascertain fihat the exhent of the imp�overnen}s are necessary <br />for the road to serve its rurpose, thus before any final recommenc�ations cre <br />made, it will be important ;� ascerhain to a reasonahle dec�iee ihe extent of <br />these expenses <br />;s. We have not, as yet, examinetl the traffic tlow projections, and iiiese figures <br />will of course be instrum�ntal in datermininy t{�e extent ��f the im��ovements <br />thc�t are necessary. One item �f concern th�t �ve note at tf,is time would be <br />the �fficiency of access to the two shopping centers a� the intersec.tion of <br />Lexington and Larpenteur Avenue. Generally, you will note that the cuts <br />in the median strip are allowed only at crossinys of public streets. In the case <br />of the shopping center, tf�is policy may not necessarily be the best solution. <br />�gain, examinai`ion of the traffic flow will be �he key fuctor in determining <br />a solution to this problema We �vould suggest no imm�diate action on the <br />proposal pendinc-� more detailed examination of the point� ncted, <br />