Laserfiche WebLink
�, t rw ♦ <br />GA,�!$ �O, �1-'I <br />G1-SS <br />� G1-86 <br />Locatian: <br />� <br />J <br />�M�� OY'� <br />(Wernar 8ud Maier;� <br />(Bar�ey Schmtg) <br />�� <br />� <br />West of R�ce �er�et and porth of Iligk�way 36 <br />(�ee �Icetc�) <br />Action Requested: Ke�oning of property from "R-1" �to "R-3�' <br />Planning Coneideratioa <br />1. A�s each of you ie awere, there are three aepar�te parc�le and <br />ttex�e aep�rmte r��r,nin� p�ti„r�ons affQ�ted by a sin�le develop- <br />rnent proposed £or Che arcas in queeCion. i3ach �f. �h��� prop�rtie� <br />!�; indicat�d on the sketch r�t �i�e teft �nd are co�aidered ae a <br />eingle pl�nnimg isBue in thie report. I� s�c�uld be not�d th�t case <br />I�o. 61-�6 (Barney Sch�ig� w�a not eui>mi�tdd �►t the requ�et of the <br />properlGy owner bu� r�ferred to the Planning Comc�ie�toa by tbe <br />Co�ncil ia view of the earli�r �uggest�on thet all of thn prapertiu <br />in qu�etion be conaidered � single "gpot" of ein�le family residential <br />eurroua�cYed by Muleipla Reaident�el tc►ning �nd dev�lop�neat. Thu,�, <br />tha propnrtiea in r�uestion as fa� as the developere are conc�erned �re <br />tb�e larger prop��r,f�e� to tb� �west and an••th vith the Schmig propeacty <br />und8r �onef�d�s�tion �e t`he la�t to be �b s to accoa�plisb more 2ogic�l <br />resouing if aay of the peti�ic�na �r� app �ov�d. <br />�. A p�evioue repo�t on the Maieac t 61-71) i8 appen�ed� to th�s rep�ort . <br />�'he latter rezoning petition covered the i�ai�iel de��elop�en� propoasl <br />a�nd �utlimee the general �spects of �be queetion. <br />3. W� reCeived oa Friday D�cember ly a revi�ed copy of curreat propoB�l <br />coverning �he M�ier �nd Werner propertien with a tentative idea auggnst�d <br />(not proprased) development of the 3chmig property. `The folloving art <br />ou�r comments on the d�velopment pl�as as subm�tt�dv <br />a. Traffic - c�� have checked �ith the S tBCe Highway DepBrt- <br />ment with respe�t to propoaed chasg� far the intereection <br />� f E�ig�evay 3b and Aice S treet and par�iu�nt tr�ff ic vo lumes . <br />T'he i,�ter�ection is to be ez�panded to � typical diamond which <br />wili involve coneider�obi.e expansion of Iand ar�a us�d princi- <br />pa12} t� the south of Y�ighway 36. �°h� pre8ent rig�t-of--way <br />line '.�, the northWest qua�dr�nt of the interaection will nv� <br />be changed. T�e approEimate pvsition of the ne�w acce�� ramp <br />(replacing the exis�ing ramp) ig approai�ately as gho�e�a on <br />th� devel�opment plr�n, The traffic volumes on �ice Stre�t in <br />I960 were 10,800 vehicles (b�th directions} aorth of Aigh�ay <br />36 and 12�7Q0 vnhicles sauth of Highway 36. IInder these <br />conditiong it would be theoreticallgr adv�ntageoue ta iocate <br />Che nea�est access to Rice S treet narth of ��e iIIterchange at <br />a point agpro�i�ateiq 300' nortt� of the tura�ng r�ps . T'he <br />propoeed �ccess road to t4�e aite im question im approiia�tely <br />22t�' aorth of the praposed ae� acc�ss ramp. T�e high�ray <br />angineers stgted, hti�ever, that they did not feel tbat thfs <br />waa a p�rticula� probXem with respecC ta tl�e turaing mova- <br />menta at the fn��rchange. <br />