My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Planning Office Hours 1983-1985
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
1983-1993 Correspondance and Office Hours Records
>
Planning Office Hours 1983-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2016 4:20:27 PM
Creation date
2/9/2016 12:55:27 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. • <br />0 <br />S January 19, 1984 <br />-3- <br />8) Kammueller - 633-0070. Caro.l Kammueller li.ves it 2858 Huron in a single- <br />famlly }iome, and has three dogs on the s�te. Rscently, one of tlle dogs <br />got loose; and when retur�ied by tl�e dog catcher, sl�e iaas made aware of tlie <br />fact they had three dogs. Thus, a complaint was issued inasmuch as only <br />two dogs over four months old are allo�aed in a single-family residence. <br />The dog catclier apparentl�� gave lier t}ie impression she could seek a <br />"kertnel license" to enable her to keep the tl�ree dogs. Actually, the <br />ordinance does not make provision for such a license, but requires that <br />the keeping of more than two dogs be done only in a kennel x]iat requires <br />commercial zoning. We suggestecl one solution obviously is to get rid <br />of one of the dogs. Anotl�er mig}lt be to give one of tlie do�s to a <br />neighbor. We noted the £act tliat most cammunities in the metropolitan <br />area liave similar regulations, and that tlie palicy relating to tlle number <br />of dogs in a residential area has been consistent since 1959. S}ie may <br />make a request that the City considep changing the ordinance. We noted <br />tllat sucll a change �vould have to afiect tlie entire City, and thus may <br />conscitute a conc�rn grea�er than her individual problem. <br />9) [�leisenheimer - 633-9434, Pat b�eisenheimer operates ttvn seli-service car <br />washes in the metropolitan area, and proposes to develop sucl� a facility <br />in Roseville. Sucli a use would require a special use in a Q-3 zonin� <br />• district. {Ye reviewed available sites tiiat cauld theoretically accommodate <br />suc}� a use, and concluded t11at tlie possibilities oi purc}iasing sucli a site <br />within the cost range sucli facilities can afforei would likely be very <br />difficult in Roseville. <br />10) Platt - 831-232G. Diike Platt is a farmer Directoi• of Acquisitians for <br />the Pi.11sbui•y Company, anci na�v is in the business Qi developirig a series <br />of restaurants in the metrapalitan area }.nowvn as "Fudrucke�•s". A typical <br />Fudruckers store is about 8,000 sq, ft., f�aturinb tlie preparation of tlie <br />mcat and buns for the sale o� elt3borate hamUurgers, wliich include a large <br />condiment table tivllere individual customers C1T1 "eiihance" tlicir hamburgers <br />on their own. I�le has procured a purchase agreement for the polar food <br />locker site, wliicll would appear to Ue just barely aclec�uate �or his size <br />facility. ThE southerly 50 feet of �his site is zdn�d single-family; <br />tlius a rezoning would be involved. lie lias also looked at p��tting tlle <br />facility in the newly approved SIIO��lIl� center north of ltosedale. We <br />suggested that a location in suc}i a site might well be more appropriate <br />due to the inilux of traffic from ttie regional center. IYe discussed t}iis <br />possibility witli respect to bot}i sites nortii of Rosedale (tlie second being <br />tlie redevelopmenfi of the r�siciential area to the west of tlie American <br />Redevelopers' site) approved last montl� by the Cou»cil. <br />Ile also �lot�d the requirement for a liquor license. �Ye informed }iim of the <br />fact that there are only tivo licenses left; a condition which he had discussed <br />wit}i Steve North previously, tiVe noted tliat it is in tlie City's int�rest to <br />� retain tliese licenses for development in t}ie tax increment distric�, which <br />constitutes one of tlie significant reasons why }ie might choose to locate in <br />one of the areas nortli of Rosedale, tiVe suggested lle discuss tlle liquor <br />license issue with the City Manager inasmuch as that is not an item relating <br />directly to ttie land use zoning controls in this instance. He informs us <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.