Planning Office Hours 1983-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

6 20 84 - �7/ 84 / / � -2- from the site, and there are �hagltheamc}angemtheagaraged to . the North. It is suggested, Y arrangement so that the garagestive and work bettler from�awhicli will make the units more attrac visitor parking stand point. They are going to make some revisions to the plan, and will be submitting it for rezoning to R-2 an d division of the landaiTa°lroadecoachelwliichhwasptornr�Y you may recall was occupled by down in tlie early 70's. Tlone�ofethe}lwlitsc�lased the property in 19G8 will be occupying 3) Erlicli. Tom Erlich, Dave P�Iutman, and LiUy James, and Tom Borman, were in to discuss preliminary plan ale�r D]ickdParknumeis fromheir S}iopping Center Nortli-West of Rosed b4erla Associates, Consulting Engineers wlio presented a potential Storm-Water Ponding Concept which moves tlle ponding facility to the tllree lots that the City om �t°ofl'land available foredevel- objective is to increase the a opment on their site by eliminating appxoximately one acre of land tliat woulci have Ueen required for �he ponding area to serve their site plus the American Redevelopers site to the east as originally l�roposed in the tax increment development district. `fheir preliminary S�}1eme presented with this concept may allow up �0 1G2,000 sauare Feet of development, and would not require the City to aquire an acre of land from tiieir site for ponding. Tlley pointed out that at their aquisitiointed�Qutnthateiffthe�Cityis � worth approximately $300,000. 1Ve p doesn't elect to Uuild a pond �urnisilet}ieYlandrandnthelpondcat that they would Ue required to f their own expense, and that the value oi the land in the far �ortl�-t:ast corncr ot tlie site may i�ot be �300;000.. David Dro�vn poizlted au� tllat tlie reason tlley did not propose tlze pond in that location is that there is a 3G inch diameter storm sewer that ��asses through the tllree lots near the C�Ilt@Y'i 1nd that t11is storm sewer would }�avc to Ue relocated if it is to ve used for ponding purposes. This is Uecause th@ storm sewer is operatin� at near capacity and does hav� a"head" on it. In ot��erwords, it fills up prociucin� an overflow concii�ion. David noted, however, thlt the proposal has merit if the economics of moving the storm sew�r line are appropriatG and that the City �vill look into this altern�tivc design. In the mean time, t}tere is a puUlic hear�ng S�n�aui�a on the fcasibility stucly for review by tlie Cowlcil on July 9th. l�le noted that it may be appropriate to check wiih our le�al council regardin� the l�ossibility o� considerin� this as an alternative. Legal notices however, may require that a new hearing be scheduled to report on the feasiUili�y study of such an alter�la�ive. IVe reviewed tlle preliminary site plan Wj11C11 llas Ueen revised fr�m l�revious concepts. 1Ve noted our cnncern with the location of �the • easterly end of the center str��t`o�stru�tednint,the�American �f the puUlic sireet W�11C�1 would Redevelopers' site to tlleir east li�ie. Tliis ilew public street