Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />� <br />June 29, 1983 <br />T0: Jim Andre <br />FROM: Howard Dahlgren <br />gUg���T; planning Office Hours - June 15, 1983 <br />1) <br />2) <br />� <br />� <br />Harwood - 483-3345. Mr. Harwood 1.__ves aalonl thenshorelwithnnewtimbers , <br />and wants t� replace his retaini��7 wall g Wants to replace th�e <br />He notes the wall is not necessary► but he simplyWe told him that to build <br />old one which has fallen down (concrete bloak)��val of the Council, but <br />a n�w wall would requi re shore line zoning PP look better. <br />suggested the appearance of the shore line would actually <br />if retained in its natural state. Thus. monehetoareplace�itne�Hedsa d <br />cotxld simply remove it and not spend the Y and would just <br />he didn't want to proceed with any application procedure, <br />drop the whole idea. <br />Mr. Heikenen owns the property at the southeast <br />Heikenen - 633-4448. Road C. This land was leased by <br />corner of Walnut Street and Caunty <br />Trans-American Traile r Repair, which has since cl�sed its operation. <br />the east side of the property► there is a platted st�•eet called Eus�is, <br />� ment for Walnut. We have a fire hydrant on <br />which at one time was the align ro erty, <br />Eustis. Mr. Heikenen wants to vaiTeehEa arit.tOWedhadtdiscussed this with <br />substitutin q an easement to the f Y <br />Mr. Heikenen before, and have noted the hydrant se rves a useful purpose <br />there, and that existence of the right�-°n'�he futurell Wefsugges edrhe <br />more-intensive development of the las� <br />Simply leave it as is. <br />3) <br />Olson - 488-����• �r• Olson has a 20' x 42' garage, with � 10' setback <br />off Victoria, abov� a rather high bank•rianceaforrthe�expansion� fVthis y <br />with 11is contractor, and suggested a va <br />9 <br />araqe would be app ropriate; in line with the existin g location on the <br />caest side of Victoria. <br />q) Bridqeman - 489-8572• �u9 Lindeman from the Bridgeman Ic� Cream Company <br />on and County Road II was in to discuss the moving of hi:� sign <br />�t ��ln� articularly for southbound traffic <br />so it will hav� bette r visibilitv, P� � Which he would like to <br />on I�r.ington. The existing sign is 12 x 4 �ylon, <br />mave closer to the corner of Lexington ine awhichehe issgoinq toecheck �S <br />to the exact location of the pYoPer�y 1 ► <br />out fearther, and � <br />et back to us reqardinq possible change; that could be <br />made to improve his identification situation. <br />� <br />