Planning Office Hours 1983-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� July 8, 1983 T0: SUBJECT: FROM: ❑ James F. Andre Planning Office Hours - July 7, 19�33 Howard Dahlgren �j •' �`� �� li �C � �� 1) Fultan - 920-9280. Don Fulton of th� �berhardt Con�pany has a listing for the 7.3 acre tract owned by the Murphy Trucking Company, north of Fulham Pond. He had questions regarding�the zoning of the land, and the pc�tential for the reshaping of the pond. Da.vid Drown showed him the easement that currez�tly applied to the property, which consists of a r�ctanaular area, 590' x 165', plus an area 255' x 130'. David explained that we had had previous discussions with Bob Pope, architect, regarding various ways in whi.ch the pond could be reshaped and the easemen�ts changed so as to provide for ultimate development 1 R d' ha foY ondin ri hts furthe r to of land contiguous to Termina oa in exc nqe _ p � g the west. He noted that dbOLlt 40,000 yards of material are scheduled to come out of the pond, which would then balance the land for ultimate deve.�opment. David noted that the City has just hired a soil testing company to get soil tests of the area, specifically north of the pond. We discussed ways in which the land could be developed, includina the possi,.�i]_ity of condominium offices around the pond, wherein the pond could be featured as an asset to the site. We also discusse�? the possibility of the acciuisition of the houses on F'ulham Street, which ideally should be incorporat-�d into the site plannirig and develop�- ment of the site. We suggested to t4r. Fulton that he seek buyer� of the land with the understanding the pond could be reshaped �y agreement w�.th the City so as to achieve a more desirable development site. David also noted that up tA 1000 of the pondin g project is scheduled to be paid �ar under the tax increment financing p rogram. We suggested tha�: h� keep in close touch with us regarding development possibi.lities. 2) Novak - 646-4035. Ed Novak is contemplating the purchase of a single-family lot at the northeast corner of Eiamline and Garden. `�'his lot tias 88.24 feet of frontage at Garden, and a depth of 149 feet on HarnlinE. Other lots in the area are of. approximately this same scale. He inquired as to the possibility of dividin g the lot, which would appear to produce a 1ot on the corner with 74.5 feet of frontage, and a depth o� 88.24 feet. We suggested that in view of the scale of the lots in the ar.ea that this division could be highly questionable. We also discussed other areas �aithin the City where he might choose to build.