Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />� <br />DATE: <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />SUBJECT: <br />1. Ross <br />M E M O R A N D U M <br />December 10, 1990 <br />Steve Sarkozy <br />John Shardlow <br />pLANNING OFFICE HOURS, November 21, 1990 <br />Dan Ross representing Tanurb Companies, the owners of Rosedale <br />Commons Shopping Center, <br />was in to request approval of an <br />amendment to the special use permit t �oritinu d�byr the Planning <br />be locatPd on this site which Was The reason for the <br />Commission at their November meeting. <br />continuation was to allow Mr. Ross to would t� overn 11 of rthe <br />signage desiqn framework manual that g <br />signage on the property. This manual WOnaturec of the Csignage non <br />as height, width, area, materials and <br />the sight, as well as such characte�ist Ross aghad l�not � hadthan <br />signage design related items. s ecific at this time, so we <br />opportunity to put together anythin iving him advice as to how he <br />spent.the time during the meeting g <br />should appoach this problem, what elem�n�tsain appraWal from the <br />level of detail�nd d conditi nal u�se permit <br />City for the am <br />2. Palmer <br />John Pelmer, representing <br />the Sc�uth Oaks Partnership, owners oP <br />an apartment building at 10a0 County Road D was in to discuss an <br />application for approval of � rear yard uariance that was <br />proposed by Mr. <br />Paimer at the November Planning Commission <br />meeti.ng. This application was cantinued due to a number o <br />considerations raised by <br />the engineer�ng depa►rtment in their <br />r�view of this application. Mr. Palmer cam� in to discuss each <br />og these items and to r�view W�ththat �ell but�ane E tt�e�itenns <br />them. It appeared from th� meating <br />could be r�solved and that Mr. Palmer thg hconcr to �curbing could <br />� letter t� the city indica�ing when <br />be installed on the parking lot, which would be tk►e final <br />unresolved condition of apProval. It should bc� uncle�stoo� t�ht� <br />there is no construct�on propo��com�lthwithbthet30r f�t� �etb�ick <br />fact that the rear yard did no p Y <br />was rev�aled during a title search pursuant to refinancir�g o� th� <br />prop�rty. <br />3. Bu�s� <br />� Rick Busse, the owner of the property on Larpenteur <br />been in to see staff and consultants on numerous <br />Avenue, has <br />occasions <br />