Laserfiche WebLink
out if it could be split. The listing that she showed indicated <br />that the property had 215 feet of .frontage on Lake Owasso. Our . <br />records and the review of the count�r section map and pl�t maps <br />indicated that it had closer to 90 feet of frontage. <br />In addition to the concerns related to the width of the site, we <br />also informed her that because Owasso Boulevard South curves and <br />proceeds due south, opposite the Fenner property, the parcel does <br />not have sufficient access on a public street to allow it to be <br />split. As you will recall from previous memos, all of the lots <br />that proceed easterly from the Fenner lot gain access off of a <br />driveway that appears to rest on railroad right-of-way. None of <br />these homes would appear to have sufficient legal access on a <br />public street. <br />This is a condition that we probably should address as w� look at <br />the Comprehensive Plan Update. There �re a couple of these home <br />sites located to the extreme eastern po�tion of this point of <br />land �hat have very, very minimal lot d�pths and the futur� <br />disposition of thes� properties should be reviowed in thQ City's <br />policy documents, <br />Q. Stev� Zeece <br />Mr 2�eco was in to discuss his a�plication for preliminary and <br />�inal plet �pp�oval Por his p�operty locat�d between County Road <br />��nd Hurk� �v�nue, w�st of Rice Street. Mr. and Mrs. Zaece <br />apptied for pr�liminary and �inal plat approv�l, a�d that � <br />applEc��ion was r�viQwed �y th� Planning Commission at th�ir <br />Nov�n�ber mooting. Th� application w�s continuQd pending thQ <br />d�tQrn�inat�on by thQ City Council whath�x or not to �ollow th� <br />P�rks ^ommission�s recommendation to soll tiha park proparty <br />�mmediat��ly e�s� o� �ha Ze�ce prop�rty. Ig th� City Council <br />de�crmine� thgt this land is surplus and w�ll no� be us�d �or <br />�ark �urpo�:e�, th�n th� matt@r of �cc�ss to th�t �r@� �djacent to <br />tho ZQac� propQrty will naad to bo dotarminod. Tharo �lso ha� <br />b��n some discussion about th� noed to �rovid� acc��s to the very <br />d�ep lots that �re opposite thQ Z��c� prop�rty to thQ w�st �nd <br />�om� discussion at tha C�ty Council l�ve� should occur �elated to <br />the streat p�tt�rn �o sorve this �rQa in t�e futur�. <br />� <br />