Laserfiche WebLink
• possibility of going to a monument sign solution similar to the <br />Olive Garden Restaurant in Bloomington. <br />Yesterday I received a telephone call from Bob Kuepper's <br />secretary at Fine Associates telling me that Bub wouldn't be <br />available to come to the meeting today but that Fine Associates <br />had two concerns about the requirement of a monument sign on this <br />site. First of all, the entire planned unit development had been <br />developed with lots that had pylon signs either built on them or <br />available to them and two, that he was concerned that the very <br />large monum��nt sign that has been built in Bloomington would <br />limit the visibility of their last remaining lot within this <br />development. Mr. Baldwin said that they were very interested in <br />cooperating with the City but at this time they were also very <br />concerned about the visibility of the restaurant being set back <br />from Snelling Avenue as far as it is. They are proposing to <br />request approval oi a pylon sign that meets al� of the ordinance <br />requirements and that wi11 be a pylon sign. <br />6. Sue Meyer (854-8800) <br />Ms. Meyer came in to gain facts about the oppo�tunities for <br />improving the siqnage for the apartments that are located south <br />o� Mc�arrons Boulevard North and west of Rice Str�et. In our <br />discussion, we determined that the existing sit� signage is on <br />� the church property across on th� north side of McCarrons <br />Boulevard North and not on the lots that the apart:�ents are <br />lacated on. We ex�lained to her t�at this was a� off ��_emise� <br />advertising sign and not allowed by current code. Th� a��.rtments <br />are now under new management and th�y are interes�ed in having <br />some temporary signage to kick off the grand openinq and to <br />announce the fact that �he� are u�der new management. We gave <br />her two �opies of the sign permit applica�ion, ane for any <br />temporary signagP that they wish to re <br />any modifica�zon� to the p�rmanent signage hat th y may� r�quest <br />approval of. �e gave her a copy of the sign ordinance and <br />discussed the possibilities for new signaq� on the site. <br />7. Les Goldblatt (698-6544) <br />Mr. Goldblatt was representing �he Roseville Senior House at 1045 <br />�. Larpenteur. Mr. Gold�latt explained t�at he had recentl� <br />receiwed an assessment in the amount oi $13,000 for improvements <br />to Dionn� Street to the north side of th�ir facility. The Sen3or <br />House �oes n,�t take 3ny access off o� Dio�ne and he was conc�r�ed <br />about the fac� that Me di�n't henefit from the improv�ments and <br />was in�erestea in discussing the possib�lity of gettfng a curb <br />cut off ��f Dionne and providing $om� addit�onal parking for the <br />faci�ity �ff of Dionne. We discuss�d the or�inan�e requirements <br />and agreed that we would look up the file �nd determine if there <br />haa been any discussions or conditions of a�proval, specifically <br />� related to access off of Dionne �hat wauld iimit thiso <br />Otherwise, it appeared that there was mo�e than ample land in <br />this rear yard area to acaomodate some additional parking. <br />