Laserfiche WebLink
� plat for a portion of his property located between Burke and <br />County Road B, east of William. Mr. Zeece is proposing to plat 3 <br />lots, each in excess of 110 feet in width along Burke Avenue. <br />The remainder of his property would be shown in a preliminary <br />plat gaining access via cul-de-sac from County Road B, �ahich is <br />where Mr. Zeece and his wife currently reside. The proposed <br />preliminary plat was very straight forward, all three of the lots <br />would meet or exceed City standards. <br />3. A1 Sands (489-1393) <br />Mr. Sands was in to inquire whether or not a lot that is owned by <br />his mother on McCarrons Blvd. S. is a buildable lot. We reviewed <br />the half section drawings and the section aerials and de�ermined <br />that although the property is somewhat oddly shaped, that it did <br />contain sufficient area and could be developed in a manner that <br />was consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. We discussed <br />the various procedures for proceeding with the development of <br />this lot and Mr. Sands left to co;:template which direction he was <br />going to chose with the subjEct property. <br />4. Art Mattaini (631-0410) <br />Mr. Mattaini is one oi two owners of the property that is located <br />south of County Road C and immediately west of the M�nnesota <br />• Beltline Railway Co. Mr. Mattaini was in to discuss the rules <br />and requirements to locate a new accessory building on this <br />property. He and his partner had recently torn down a <br />dilapidated and blighted structure that was lncated on the east <br />end of this lot and are proposing to replace it with a mobile <br />metal building, not unlike the temporary bank buil�ing that is <br />located on the Fine Associates property on Coun�y Road C. We <br />discussed th�s situation for some time and determined that they <br />really only needed to have approval of t�is use for 2-1/2 years <br />and we cdncluded that it was probably in everyones be�t interest <br />to process this as an interim use. �ordy Bese�h was to discuss <br />wit�. �r. Mattaini whether or not permanent fo�tings would be <br />required ior the building and we directed Mr. Mattaini to write a <br />letter to Rick Jopke requesting that the City Council consider <br />the granting of an interim use permit for this accessory building <br />on the lot. It was clear from my discussion that this lot has <br />been rather unsightly in the past and that this property owner <br />was making an effort to try and clean up trie property and improve <br />both its functi4n and its appearance. Consequently, we felt that <br />although this accessory structure may not meet our ultimate <br />standards for the ar�a, it was clearly a step in the right <br />direction and would be a step pursuant to cleaning up the site. <br />5. Todd Baldwin �829�3420) <br />Mr. Baldwin came in to show us the proposed signage for the Olive <br />� Garden Restauran�. They are proposing a pylon sign tha� is well <br />within the area requirements set forth in the City ordinance. We <br />discussed the conversation that the Council had regarding the <br />