Laserfiche WebLink
� ROSEVILLE PLANNING OFFICE HOIIRS 10/23/91 2 <br />being adjacent to a Business district), and a rezoning to R-3 for <br />the apartments would be appropriate. <br />2. Kris Kristufek, Steve Amick; Amoco (831-3464) <br />Peter Bachman; Leonard, Street, & Deinard (335-1862) <br />�moco is interested in rezoning two R-1 lots at 'Lexington and <br />Highway 36 (north of 36, south of the Kinderberry Hill daycare <br />center) to allow a service station. They had been in a few month� <br />ago to raise the question and we reviewed some of the issues tha.t <br />might be involved in such a request. We indicated that it had been <br />the expressed policy of the City to preserve the Highway 36 <br />corridor for residen�ial uses as much as possible, and that <br />rezoning for a gas station would not be accepted well. If such a <br />use wer� to go in that location, there would be concerns over the <br />traffic flow on Lexington near the freeway entrance ramps, <br />compatibility with the daycare center and future residential uses <br />to the east �(on the vacant R-3 land), and the visual aesthetics of <br />the development from Highway 36, as well as from Lexington Avenue <br />and the surrounding neighborhood. <br />iWith these comments in mind, Amoco had an architect prepare a <br />concept rendering of the proposed station. Although there were <br />numerous changes from the typical Amoco development (brick <br />building, brick canopy posts, brick monument signage, flowers on <br />the boulevard) , overall the effect was not very dramatic - it still <br />looked just like a gas station. We told them as much, and said <br />that if they were serious about the proposal, they should consider <br />"breaking the mold" for their gas station design. We suggested <br />gable roofs for the building and canopy, more internal landscaping, <br />more effectiv� peripheral landscaping, and less red, white, and <br />blue logo striping. They took our comments well, and said they <br />wo�ld discuss whet�;er they could afford to propose such a dF:sigzz. <br />We also assured them that even though the precedent was against a <br />rezoning in this location, we would keep an open mind and judge the <br />proposal on its merits, i.e., if a gas station could function in <br />such a way as to preserve the residential character of the highway <br />corridor (through design, landscaping, lighting, traffic fl�w, <br />etc.), then we might consider it positively. <br />3. Joel & Phyllis Dillner, 2192 Acorn Rd. (633-3230) <br />The Dillners want to expand the garage on a home they built in the <br />� Acorn Road neighborhood. They recently split their existing lot <br />to create a new lot on which the new home is built. They live in <br />