Planning Office Hours 1989-1991 Dahlgren

Home

• ROSEVILLE PLANla�.'G OFFICE HOURS 10/2/91 2 � 5) Some of the parking on site did not meet minimum dimensions. On the south side of the Amoco building, the dimension was 32' for a single� bay of parking, instead of the 42' standard. This bay will be eliminated in favor of providing stacking space for the car wash, which was not provided in the submitted plans. 6) There is a small building on site which contains monitoring equipment for soil contaminants. This program will be completed this spring and the building would be removed for this project. 7) Sidewalks on both B and Dale are needed. 8) The retail building on site had been shown as partially razed - the southern portion now containing Carbone's would be torn down, and Carbone' s would move into the northern (more structurally sound) portion. Keeping this portion of the building on site for Carbone's contributed to the lack of adequate parking. Mr. Anderson indicated that there may be some flexibility in what actually happens to the building. 9) Related to the above point is the parking on the north side of the existing retail building. It currently extenc�s into a private access easement a� the far north end of the site, leaving only 13', instead of 18', for the depth of parking spaces. If the use or disposition of the entire building is changed, thes� s�aces m�y not be neec�ed, and the easement can be respected. 10) All rooftop units, existing and new, will need to be screened. 11) All trash will be taken tA the back room of the new service building. 12) Landscaping was slio�vn in the right-of-way, which can only occur in the first 3'. hlith some af the modific�tion we suggested, the�.^e may be room to provid� the r�quYred yard setback� and landscaping. 13) The new s�rvice bays will be back 5' from the side lot line, retail building, We said this was an existing 30' access easement on provides the necessary sep�ration, the am�unt of encroachment. in a building that is se� the same as the existing r�easonable, since there is that sid� of the site that and th�y are no� increasing � 14) We suggested the en�ire project be brought in as a PUD, since it will combine two previously s�parate parc�ls.