Laserfiche WebLink
e ROSEVILLE PLANNING OFFICE HOURB 9,�18/91 � <br />sign, which is approximately 6' x 12', that would mean a total sign <br />height of 38'. If the Commission and Council were to accept this <br />approach to signage for his site and grant a variance, these <br />dimensions would be reasonable ones to apply. <br />I also informed him of Councilmember Maschka's request for a <br />discussion among the various property owners in the area who are <br />faced with a similar situation, in order to see if there might be <br />a solution involving common signage instead of individual variances <br />(Rick Jopke is arranging that meeting). Mr. Platt said he would <br />participate in such a discussion, but didn't see a way it could be <br />easily resolved, or even whether all properties had the same <br />problem that he did. <br />For example, the Stuart Anderson Cattle Company sign is reasonably <br />visible already (albeit not placed according to the approved site <br />plan), Khan's Barbeque has a'window' of vfsibility between <br />Investors and the Olive Garden restaurant, and the carpet outlet <br />store may not have the same need for drive-by visibility. <br />Investors Savings, Olive Garden, and Roseville Community Bank are <br />n�t hidden in the way Fuddruckers is, and probably would not be <br />willing to give up their current signage for common signage <br />• elsewhere. <br />3. Gary and Sue Cormican <br />The Cormicans live in a single family hame at the southwest corner <br />of County Road D and Evelyn Street. Their back yard, to the west <br />of the house, slopes quickly down and a�ay from the house into a <br />City drainage pond, leaving then�, essentially, without a useable <br />back yard. They want to fEnce a portion of their yard for their <br />large dog to run in, and are left with the yar3 facing County Road <br />D as the only reasonable option. They came in to discuss a <br />possible variance in order to build a 6' cyclone fence (taller than <br />the 4' alloweu� within the 30' setback to County Road D. <br />We explained the ration��,le for the fence se�back within the overall <br />yard requirements and ui�ed them to cansider building a�ence some <br />distance back from the lot line to allow some visual relief, and <br />to add some evergreen landscaping in front of the fenc� instead oP <br />the colored slats in the f��ce �that they we�re proposing. <br />It w�s agreed that they will apply Por a variance leaving at least <br />10' of setback from th� fence to County Road D and 25' to �velyn <br />(the exi�ting front s�t��ck), both frontages �to be landscaped wi�h <br />evergreen trees to provide reasonable screen'ng of the fenced area. <br />� <br />