Laserfiche WebLink
., <br />1�� <br />O <br />May 19, 1986 <br />T0: Ji.m Andre <br />FROM: John Shardlow <br />SUBJECT: PLANNING OFFICE HOUFtS, MAY 14, 1986 <br />1. Schultz 633-9057 <br />Mr. Bill Schultz, of 1247 Talisman Curve, wa� in to descra.be <br />his efforts to convi.nce his adjacent neighbor to go along <br />wa.th a three foot side yard variance, to allaw him to bui].d a <br />two car garage, where his current �ne and one-half car garage <br />exits today. Ndr . Schultz showe�. us a drawing of his lot an!3 <br />the existing �arage and driveway, and it apgears that ther� <br />is a major evergreen tree between the exis�ing garage and his <br />house, wrhich pro�ides a c�nstrain�t to constructing the new <br />�arage nearer to his house. He also describ�d some arcrlitec- <br />tural constraints with a landin� and a few steps which will <br />� pose a problem for locating the new structure nearer to the <br />hou�e. <br />P,ccording to Mr. S�chultz, the neighbor is an elderly wom�n <br />wha has liveci i:'che house for a long time, and simgly does <br />not feel comfortable in signing off on the variance. We <br />explained to M�. �chultz that it would be inappropriate for <br />us to become involved with rendering any opinion� about what <br />decisions the Planning Commission and City Coun�il might make <br />regarc�ing this variance. We explained the process for <br />r�questing a variance through the City, and Mr. Schultz left <br />intending to discuss it with h�is neighbor further, and if he <br />was not successful in r��olving it wa.th her, coming ba�ck to <br />appear before the Council in Jun� for referral to the he�ring <br />in July�. <br />2. Feyen, 489-0445 <br />Scott Feyen did not show up for his appoi;,'-ment. <br />3. Havlichek, 489-4306 <br />Mrs. Georgiann Havliahek was in to inquire about the <br />possibility of a lot split for her pz•operty on Rice Street. <br />Although she has a l.ot which is greater in size than the <br />minimum required by the code, ther� would not be street <br />access to the rear of her property. Therefore, we informed <br />her that it would not be possible to approve such a lot split <br />• at this time. <br />