My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Correspondence 1985-1989 Dahlgren
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
1983-1993 Correspondance and Office Hours Records
>
Correspondence 1985-1989 Dahlgren
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2016 8:56:49 AM
Creation date
2/9/2016 12:57:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />n <br />LJ <br />Planning Office • <br />October 22, 1986Hours <br />•' <br />Page 5 <br />9. West, 338-0012 <br />Pete West is from the Maxfield Research Group, and was in to <br />review recent development trends in the City of Roseville <br />relevant to market analysis being conducted by their company <br />in the City of Roseville. These studies relate to the use <br />of land at the southeast corner of Highway 36 and Hamline <br />Avenue, now occupied by the Wilbert-Chandler Vault Company <br />(2.45 acres), and the homes to the south (counting a total <br />of 7 . 8 acres ) . <br />I expressed our concern regarding the marketability of <br />office development proposed and committed within the <br />community as relates to the theoretical market discussed in <br />recent studies done for the City, <br />The staff reviewed with Mr. West, develapments <br />planned, approved, or under consideration in thepCityseof <br />Roseville. <br />10. Bressler 531-751-3478 <br />John Bressler represents a cellular telephone system known <br />as �1ew Vecture, a subsidiary of U.S. West. They are looking <br />for a site for a two hundred foot high transmission tower in <br />the vicinity of Shoreview and/or Roseville. <br />I noted our regulations regarding "antenna" height, wherein <br />Council approval is required in cases where the Building <br />Inspector considers the impact may be deleterious. I <br />reviewed recent history of antenna height, and suggested <br />that a more appropriate site may be found in a contiguous <br />community. <br />11. Franke, 636-6400 <br />Bi11 Franke and Tim Nelson of JLN Development were in with <br />Bob Vaney and Dick Heise, newl a <br />their development proposal at the southeast cornereofsHifhr <br />way 36 and Hamline. g <br />I reviewed my concerns regarding this <br />the conversion of the land from an industriallusenoting that <br />Chandler Concrete Vault Manufacturing Company) to anWloffice <br />use is an appropriate conversion in the <br />that the height and intensity of the landlusenwillStbebua <br />significant problem to the contiguous single family area. <br />In this case, it was noted that a substantial tax increment <br />subsidy is proposed on their part and, that without that <br />support the project is economically unsound. <br />I suggested they seek a different site in the City, in that <br />the proposal will be competing with a limited market poten- <br />• tial for high quality office structures which are <br />for and approved in other parts of the Cit planned <br />their extreme interest in this site, and theirTdesire�tto <br />proceed with the normal Planning Commission and Council <br />review. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.