My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Correspondence 1985-1989 Dahlgren
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
1983-1993 Correspondance and Office Hours Records
>
Correspondence 1985-1989 Dahlgren
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2016 8:56:49 AM
Creation date
2/9/2016 12:57:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
=► <br />,`', . <br />; October 14, 19 <br />� <br />T0: Jim Andre <br />� <br />�J <br />FROM: Howard Dahlgre,i <br />SUBJECT: PLANNING OFFICE HOURS, OCTOBER 8, 1986 <br />1. Hunn, 646-5756 <br />Barbara Hunn owns two houses contiguous to one another, <br />fronting on Ruggles and Hamline. She has a backyard pool on <br />the property on Hamline where she resides, and proposes to <br />add a 8'x 35'x 4' "lap" pool. The latter is proposed to be <br />within a structure for wintertime exercise swimming. The <br />structure would be attached to an existing three season porch <br />at the upper level of the house (the existing outside pool is <br />at the lower walkout basement level). <br />It appears the location proposed is the obvious place to put <br />the addition. However, it will infringe on a lot line <br />separating the two properties, so it is a matter of adjusting <br />the lot line. The property on Ruggles is occupi�d by an <br />older house, with the house set near the rear lot line so <br />that the movement of the lot line will place it less than <br />thirty feet from the new rear lot line. However, this lot is <br />very large, with the house being set well back from Ruggles <br />(this being the original farm house in this area). At some <br />point in the not too distant fut.ure, the older house will <br />likely be torn down, so its location relative to the proposed <br />swimming pool addition is not that crucial. <br />The drawing she presented was not drawn to scale, and some of <br />the dimensions were lacking. I suggested that firs� she have <br />the land surveyed so as to ascertain the exact location of <br />the structures and the lot lines. I suggested then that she <br />may consider tearing down the old house now, and her building <br />a new house with the pool the way she wants it (with a single <br />pool rather than two pools). I suggested that marketing a <br />home with two swimming pools may be a problem in the tuture. <br />She suggested that the teasibility of the investment over <br />time is no problem to her. <br />She is going to think about the options and get back to us <br />with a more accurate drawing. It may be that this develop- <br />ment proposal can be handled by an administrative lot line <br />movement, coupled with a minor variance. <br />2. MRC, 831-2772 <br />Gary Dodge of MRC, Jeffery Chen of Lansey Engineering, John <br />Martin of Keyser Design and Build Company, Dave Nelson, an,d <br />Del Kinney of the Mechanical Engineering E�'irm, were in to <br />review preliminarv site p�.ans for the development of the MRC <br />(Metropolitan Recovery Corporation) facility off Rose Place <br />approved over a year ago by the City Council. nave Jenkins, <br />architect, was also present. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.