Laserfiche WebLink
. <br />Cese No . �i--71 <br />61-8 S <br />61-�6 <br />S UNIl�IARY <br />(Mgier} <br />�Werne.r �nd Maier) <br />CBarney Schmi�) <br />� continued <br />look the re�of- �ap�s of the proposed development thu� in some <br />inatances ik would be �ffected by �he d�vel�pmenta There r�re of <br />�ouree, casea o£ chrzn�� i.n zc�ne ii� tLe Vi1lr.ge wherein the ad jac- <br />�nt �ing�.e family developmen� haa b�en mare closely related �han <br />thie case in que,��ion, An exat�ple oi �his is thp existing multiple <br />fami�ly zunin�, on the sau�:hwe�� corz�ez c�� rii.nnenota Av�nue and �tice <br />S�xee�. Tn tho l.a��er caa� the ch�;: �e in zone occurs at the side <br />lot line of the neare�t residence and thus w�;�e f� co�.s�.d�red at <br />thia ti�P �he ju .��i.on �aith the cuxrenL propoaal wo�xld, in our <br />opiaion, constitute a greeter problem fchttn �he change in �one at <br />�iia �eAr lo � 1 ine . <br />Ir would� of courae, be possibl� to dev�lop the pro��rty �.n ques�tion <br />for sfng,le �a�ily uses o �J� dnuj�t �rie va�idity o£ t�is proposal <br />for t�ie properties adjacent to R�.ce Street hoireve�-o �:t is s�gni- <br />ficant that no new sfnsZe ��tmily housing in the Vill�ge has been <br />conetructed along the Rice S�r�ec fxon�:n�eo Thig is undoubtedtly <br />due to �w� fFctors: <br />(L) Tlhc: large tra�'Fic valizme� an Rice Stree� ar� not conduciv� <br />to eingle family �rontage ar en•�lronmex��, <br />(2) Quesriou�ble 1.and usc�� and fu�t�re d�velopment ejon� �he <br />eAst eide o� Rice S treet (�,a��� :o£ Rosev:Ll�.e� create poor <br />conditions for s3.ngle iAzn� 1y developm�ent fronrf.ng on R�.ce <br />StreeCo It is posaible, uf cou�se� �o ori�n� driveway� <br />and s�rucCcarea i.n eingle �am��.y �xeas so ag to min�mize <br />the aforeu�entioned hazards. Q�e o£ �he prablema co��nected <br />W�.Ctl developing �he pro�erty i.n ques�:ion for single ��mily <br />use� however, ia th� 1o�a�ion oi the �A�t-west praper�y <br />line s£parai��ng the Maier pra�se���ea and th� W�xn�r propertieaa <br />The xocRtion of �hie aine is such that the lo�s contiguous <br />to Che High�r�y 36 right�-o��-��ay would be vEry shallo7�ao Coap- <br />eraCion bet�wecn the �cao nroper.�� owner� could, oi course, <br />re�tify thie s�ituai:i.on as�uml.ng some �.�rangement 4o be m�de <br />with the Scl�m3_g prope����s o <br />Taxwiae, of cours�e, i.� iE Yeeo�nized �ha� apartnen�s do canstitute <br />a tax asg�t shen considered in conjunction v�i�h �he school loado <br />2'he principal qucstion ty�.th reagect to th� proposed dev�lopme�� would <br />appear to be one v£ compa�ibi�.fty w�.th existing singl.e £ar�ily residential <br />areas to the north and wes�o Thou�h �he si.ng�!e �ami.ly dep�h is 130° on <br />the west the 20►0' of deptih aZ4ng �he nortih and �lie terrain cUnditio�s indi- <br />cate tihat tbe transi�ion to singl.e fan�ily is :��ss aiff�.cuir. fo� the proper�y <br />in queation than is frequera�Iy the ��zse, ?'he va�ued �udge�aen� for the lP�anning <br />CoIDmission and Council ta �eCermiue �er� is whe��er or not ��x� p�oposed deve- <br />lopment would constitute any undue deleteriou� efi�ec� o� the exi.s�:tng single <br />fami.ly homes in the area, <br />