|
-- - - j�-�+��i� ,�;���.
<br />3. Deteriuination of trans :�tioii and terminal rvi
<br />1 se ces�a means of determining appra
<br />deficiencies priate standards
<br />4. Farmulatio�i o� alternative solutions that `�• Tesrin� the various trans�ortatiou alternatives
<br />should be considered inclt�dinb assi�nment �f traffic to t.he vari= ; �
<br />City Pl�riiier's Restiansibility: ous proposed systems
<br />3. lletermination of the several types and loca
<br />1. Revie�v oE land use and density patterns to tion of transpoi-tation facilities ���ith xegard ,
<br />help formulate over-all objectives as to the to operational aspects �'
<br />development ancl redevelopment oE the : r
<br />rollo���ii�g tlie testing aE adequacy of tlie altei
<br />community native proposals, an evaluation of each ,pioposal '
<br />2. Consideration of the dif�erent lancl use and - " '
<br />sliould ue inade. Yardsticks can be established' to
<br />density alternatives that coulcl be realized �"' �^
<br />measiire tlie Uenefits to the traveling,ptiblic as �vell F
<br />by the community , t :
<br />as tlie i�npact t11at each plan �vill liave on commu a
<br />3. Assessment of the effect that variot.is transpor- liity developrnent. Ha�c�ing ev�luatect� each �prop�sal �
<br />tation plans �vould have on land develop- an �he b�,:;is o� these findings, the feehnical coorcli
<br />ment nating committee can now recommend whicli plan ,
<br />�. Coordination of tl�e transp�rtation plan �vir.h is most ap��ropriate f�r tlie communzty. Generally - °'r
<br />all other elements of tlle benei•al plan local la�v �vill require that tl-ie plan Ue. evaluatecl ,,�
<br />and tlien adopted by the local" planning; agericy :,1 ,; k;
<br />' Trn�'ic Eragineer's Ites�io�•�siGility: The n e c e s s a r y a�prova l o f t lie State Hig l�way. I.)e 3, ��
<br />,,
<br />1. R e v i e � v - o f e x i s u nb l e v e l o i eransportation partment should also be sought. �,`�`
<br />, . ' `' ; �
<br />`. - ,
<br />. � � t�
<br />�; ,s
<br />CARRYING OUT TH� PLAN � 4`
<br />t�;
<br />Tii carrying out tlie plan, a clase �vorking rela- plan, etc.) to foster tlie development o£ ttic ;� ='`a�� �
<br />, �{�x
<br />,` , txoiisl�i�� Uettveeri tlie variaus raEessi�nal �rou s :„»�.
<br />p � P trailsportation plan. t, `�
<br />c�.n-liel. p to ins ur e t lie logica l deve lapr�ient o f t he 2. Consulting cvitli the traf�ic eng7neer- tQ repoxt �`�`��
<br />transpeirtation prograzn, `vhiie at tlie saine time ori the' impact that various zoning changes `'��z�'
<br />minimizing disrup�i.on of normal cornmunity ac- �vill have on trans�ortation problems ��,;
<br />�: Ci�ities: Such a team i s e s�� e c i a l l y i m p o r t a n t � v i t h ,���
<br />t � . . . . . y Pu2
<br />` Tr�i�c ��zgiyteer's l,tes(�oresibility: ' J �
<br />re ga�d to ,desi gii d e t a i l s t l� a t a ff e c t o p e r a t i o n a n d - `
<br />' ���
<br />coriimunity amenities. 1. �stablishing :-tlie necessaxy operatioiial and ���` y
<br />��
<br />l l�i��ision of res�onsibility ae this stage �crould ve control measures ta assui�e sinooth traffi� :;`,tY �
<br />" � � as foliows: . opera�ion cl_uring c,onstr�.CCCicin of. �aCillties . ` `� �
<br />'t, � . � �� � � �; � � � � � � � � �, a ; ��`�
<br />, �. lleterinination oE opera�ional measures ne� �����
<br />Jnz�at� Res�iansiUzlity; , ; ,,�,�
<br />essai•y ta effeetuate ; the transportatian pro ���
<br />�.'T3etermining tlle exact lor.ation of proposec] posals ' � 5 �u��ti
<br />'��{�
<br />� trarisportation facilities 3. Review rviti� the ci�y planner prop�sed ix���ci� '�'x��,,i}�
<br />� : . -. , [ , +:� �'f� 1YY .�}�S'�
<br />` �.� Esta�ilishiiig tr�nsportation. iinprovement ri- . .�p
<br />or�ties � � : tratlic aperational changes like ane way �"���
<br />3 � L���'i
<br />; ' �. . .��. ` � ' ' t aj
<br />_ s�reet ancl t}trough-streeC.�ir,obram � ,; � �''`���
<br />� ;3 ' Kee��ing the data and, plans tip to date �� �r� t� x��
<br />��$��
<br />y� _� ,� ��� y In. developing� and �: impl��metitrng t��� pta.n, �ll `, us ��;�
<br />�Cxt Pla�t�ie�'s I�tes-�Qnsibilit : l�rofessianal.�o u p s h a v e a, r e s b n s i b i l i C t o',< i ri f c i''' ,:;, f4��°�'
<br />1 ���staulxshiiig. the necessary �lanning ,progi-am the �ublic fully of.t:lieir actians::�'ublic su ' �`�rt £o"r $ „';w �u;';��
<br />' � , � , � hA, t �� r
<br />'(o� -�s�reet parkina ��ancl load rec�uirements �� any trai�sporeation progzam �is znost essential, ai�d '�� �����;�.��
<br />� � in �zonia7; 'orclinances, rec�uiiremen�s .that ����this ��fact���iirnust be�recognizeii� during �ail hases�o'i` �;�:��``; ��'���
<br />sulidivisions, cc�nf��-m to. th�.�transpnrr.ation the pro�ram. P '��"�
<br />� '� +. jf'�Z -
<br />,. -�_ �. � ,, .. t r � I ,J� ; ��J,1� i
<br />t -. � , : ! ��. ` . . " ' _ , _. Hh�?���
<br />, ,.p�� �,�' , _ . g � �
<br />The term "res onsibil�t '' as :used throii hout ,this>: statement refers in nearl all cases to.. res onscbilit .> that � i's,� " ;' t�"'' r` �' :��'�'
<br />„ . y . .. .. . ., ,:: P, ::::. ... X . . ; ...:shaxed, by other� �. � n-�.��„
<br />�: xhan.the city planner ar �he traffic et�gineer �specifiCally:_by the city engineer, tt�e pul�Dic_.;wprks director.;cransit�of�c►als:or;:co„nr.,���ar�f� .< ��.,,<���:���
<br />, . . ....,.,••L^::a......,.:L.-L--�--- -tt _�_�,_ . ._, . .
<br />:: .,
<br />,. the degree oE responsibility of`the �city pl�
<br />rs.
<br />�ommittec Members `
<br />--o-- '�.- r+ ..���.+���aai��i.awd"CRCC�.�1
<br />jr , O K Normann; Richard..:A Overmyer;: Ar�hur' T, R�
<br />� > (4� ,
<br />
|