|
- - -:: . _;r :� .�.�,��
<br />< "- �; y'�-
<br />�" .
<br />�: � . � . . . - ..
<br />;r
<br />• ll this this t e of rom-a�r be carried otit 3. Study of trar�rtation expenditures
<br />Usua y YP P � �'
<br />within tlie existing adini�iistrative structure. I-�o�v- 4. Use of transit (if not undertaken by the transit -
<br />ever, at tiines it may be acivantageous to create a agency)
<br />special technical team or staf� to help carry out the ritv Planner's ites�vorrsibility:
<br />work load and assist the technical coordinating
<br />committee. This type of coordinated approach 1. Land use survey
<br />should also be established on a regional basis. With 2• Economic base studies
<br />such a committee framework, the responsibilities 3. Population surveys (zone by zone)
<br />'� of the ciCy planner and the traffic engineer gener- 4. Employment surveys (zone Uy zone)
<br />ally should follo�v the pattern below. In some in- 5. Social and economic surveys
<br />�, stances the joint responsihilities may involve only Tra�c Engineer's Res�onsibility:
<br />�� advisory duties; in others, they may involve actual
<br />1. Traffic volume surveys
<br />�; �articipation in the svork. �. Travel time studies
<br />i,, ;. Joint Res�ionsibili.ty: 3. Accident studies
<br />;
<br />� 1. Street use study 4. Street capacity studies
<br />�' '2: Origin `and destination study (often con- 5. Parking studies
<br />��-' ducted by state high�vay clepartments) 6. Control devices surveys
<br />��
<br />:t
<br />�� ;
<br />��:. ; :
<br />�� � ANALYSIS QF THE TA�TS
<br />, r��
<br />� ' ' industrial at-
<br />�� The analysis of the data collected �vill be largely 2. �valuation oE commercial and :�
<br />��_' , �
<br />``��" the responsibility of the professional groups that terns '
<br />»,x -
<br />r�%�` have assPmbled the information. Ho�ve�er, colla- 3. Location study o£ parks, schools, . and oeher ,,
<br />YFhj tion .oE ttle facts and, their evaluation sllould be a public facilities �
<br />,s; ,
<br />�,,�r l r; �oint effnrt Mutual understanding of how the facts 4. Analysis of social and economic paCterns �.
<br />,;��'�,,, �, �. axe i n t e r r e l a t e d i s , m o s t `: i m p o r ti a n t ; i n t h e d e v e l o p- Tra;�c Engznee a's l�es p ans z b i l i t y:
<br />��E�''''' rnent oi` an effective transportation plarr and"pro-
<br />.
<br />� _ �� ; - �� � l. Comparison �of exisCing�� �olumes �and �street � �� � ,�'
<br />� �, ;ram
<br />capacity
<br />�� � Joznt ,i�es�ionszbility: 2. Comparison oF travel times on various�.street `, �.�
<br />� ,.����a�;� : > �: :;
<br />� �,�°F ;, ;1 �Determination oE 'relationships between land segments , �. '`
<br />,�', �_ �'use, transportiation facilities, and travel haU- 3. Comparison of accident patterris £or vario�ts " ;
<br />�
<br />�� �,.
<br />r � < � ' its ` street segments : , ;
<br />��;s�y , ,
<br />jh'� 9 Analysis of the street paeterns'—spacing, inter- 4. Analysis oL traffic control measures-. �' <
<br />��N . .�: � � ' - � . . � ..' .: �' ��, ..
<br />���� i ., .
<br />:section frequency, traffic volume, and land. -
<br />:��;� ,- '�'he analysis of tliese facts should be used in de ,.
<br />t use t e ` . ; ; ;
<br />����, ,: yp � ' veloping pr��ections o£ future lanc� and traf�c; pat .� �
<br />;� � , , . : �
<br />,��� ; 3 R;eview of .the traffic ancl. transit ser�ice cliar- - s� 1;
<br />�, ti➢ terns. This wi11 call �or a j oint decision ,. as to � how ;,�
<br />�k actexistics ' tliis can best Ue done for. a particular community -
<br />�'�b �� , : ; � �,
<br />�'��� '� ; 4 Analysis oE land`access problems as. relaLed to � �,,
<br />4, Once this is .achieved,; the nature of .thP traffic ;
<br />�'�� u" types of streets �roblem should be evaluate�. by ; all .pro�essional �
<br />s��,� � , ;. : ; . � . , , : � : v r �;
<br />�}'<�, ` Czty Pla�zn�r's Responsibzlity: ' groups �ssociated with carrying out the transporta ' `' ;
<br />���`� � : 1 E�aluation of residEntyal- land patterns tion plan. ''
<br />S �k+ ]
<br />��'7�i t,
<br />�i�N`j_. " .�� � , ._. .� -,� -. ' ' �
<br />� � � 7 " fi
<br />� � `� ' DEVELOPING THE PLAN' � �
<br />,<,��� , b
<br />���kl"!S �� ��. . .: .�. '� , �'�: . .: :. h.
<br />i
<br />aint Res�ionsi�iility. ' ` `'
<br />���`�;'� ' � Wlien the;facts have lieen colleeted ancl anal�yzed, J r'
<br />,�
<br />_ .G !�/ S � .'� '. . . ��-. . ' � . .;
<br />�'� ,� � ro �riate;:.staridarcls ;. and ::obJectives , should be ,E tablisl ment . of: eneral . o� ectiv:es xeiaE��ig�:` �:;,;
<br />��,� �. aPP I? 1. , s � . . g J : , ? , �- ��
<br />� ��t i�;' i ..r.l , . . , .. ; . .. 1. 1 lt :. 4�.:
<br />,,y; fi, adc� te.d to:guide;the de�elopment;of tli�e plan and� ; '
<br />� to commtin�ty developmen,t s�
<br />�n�,riF"�" .. �, , i� , . . , .. � , r: , : i y �i 4 °.i�
<br />��;'�;:�{ tq measure transportatron �and teiminal deficien- Ado tion of:sta.ndaxds;for trans orratson:–f�d�,, �,s' ���:;:,
<br />��, �t ;, - ; 2. p ,; p , ,:
<br />����i�' cies, , resenti anc�; futtire Muc� of this' �vork �vill: . j ��,
<br />�'� �:> f� �. .- p ". . 'rofes-: sign ; capacities,', cross sections, aGce'ss co�n� `, , � , x 'F y
<br />�'�'�r` 'ha�e to be� done on a caoperat��e; basis' by . p � - ,.� , t ��;;
<br />��`' � `' u�li - a consiclerable trols, spacing and iritersect�an �;frequen,�y,; �,Y��
<br />.,�,�;�,
<br />, " � � sional groups concerried, tha �, , , � , ,, , ��,.
<br />.� «� � � speed, etc 3 ti�'
<br />��r�A� axnourit of.deCail�:work';ca�� be left:to staff �}, � `� ,�4�5���
<br />y � �, �.3� r � ��, �-� 7t,'r��r��� �:
<br />o.t��= � � r �c x ,s T �
<br />'� � 1z1 � ,�h�4
<br />�, »� ,i�' Fb-
<br />��}�4 � t } t � � 1 t{kkli .. �1 t'"u�3y �N*`,y9
<br />E,a N� Z-,� r, t a� �. r q`i.t�a�w.u'K' e'�,�`Pa�,,�u''•'`�
<br />p 1,n � �! i ifCN'lh�� •
<br />lY���'rry.t.rt u� . . .. . ... . . ... .. . ,. . . , _. ,. , . �. . . , ... . .. . . .. . . . ... . . .. .,. . , .. . , . . � .., _ 1.,, t: �. <�.. ,..G', ���`...L?:.�"a'dkaYr�
<br />
|