|
� . . .. , .:
<br />_ .T. _ :� �r
<br />,-. , ' ,:�>��,.F�.
<br />" �,,s{
<br />�
<br />, � r�8�;
<br />� � �r
<br />'�r �,�5;
<br />'..�� .. . . 4 }'_
<br />ti �a
<br />�r
<br />Memo � 2�- Marcr 8, �. 9 5 2 ri
<br />4, To our knowledge fihere has been no di�ficulfiy with `'
<br />administe:ring the present r.egula�ions with �espect -to t�e `'�
<br />control of billboardso `'
<br />�;}
<br />5o The Commission did n�t feel that the adjusfiments were in r
<br />order for the industrial dis�a�ict, though i-� may well be '�;
<br />feasible to consid�r the applieation of �he dis�ance factor �
<br />in setting the maximum sign ar�a and -�he use of the larger ,;.
<br />percentage sign area all.owanec when using apen le��ers rather �
<br />than a framed sign with backingo ;
<br />6o One of the regulafii�ns that the t'l�nning Commissian feels
<br />should definitely not be changed is the requirement that no
<br />signs be painted dix�ectly on building wallsa This is one
<br />requ�rement �hat all the sign cumpanies hav� generally a�reed ,
<br />� with, feeling that such signs are a cor:�iderable problem not '
<br />}` only in terms of maintenance but ir. �term � o.f gene?^aZ appearance
<br />as wello '
<br />'` ?, Some of you will recall that many meetings were held with
<br />,, rzpresentatives of the sign companies and the oil companies
<br />;~,. some time a�o when the last revision to the Sign Ordinance ,�
<br />' was considered, There was, at �hat time, general agreement ;
<br />rr :
<br />`' with �he Ordinance as it standa with perhaps some exc�ption to _
<br />the maximum l00 sqo fto currently required in the "B-2", "g-3"
<br />���� and the "SC" Districto One represen�ative of a local sign
<br />company tSto Paul) a�tended the Plannin� Commission meeting
<br />of March 7, and noted what we also believe to be a princiPon
<br />�� problem of administration, ieo the paper work administrati ;
<br />necessary for a sign company to operats in the metropolitan .�
<br />� area under various codes� as well as records necessary to
<br />- individual communitieso A frequent procedure is ane of inerely
<br />designing a.sign for the customeT, preparing a small �ketch, :
<br />i�`��� subma.tt�.ng lt to the Building Snspector "to see if th�y will ��
<br />'� 3�et us put it up" . Such a procadure will, of caurse, irequQt��ly t
<br />,
<br />`� produce a condition wherein � variance appears to be ir� ordern
<br />,.
<br />8 o In the light of tYae abawe background data, and reva.ew of 9om� of �
<br />��= � the cuxrent signe prop�sed ior conatruction in the Vil.lager
<br />�;z the Plann�.ng Commission suggests , tl�e followin� amendmen°�s to �
<br />�
<br />k; th��8ign Regulations section in the Zoning Ord�nance:
<br />�: ''N
<br />�; Si n Re ulations in 'tBM2" "B-3v' and "SC" Di:�tricts 1v
<br />�i
<br />� fr
<br />;q,,,._ 140281 The gross aurface area of all business signs on�a lat :
<br />� ,' ' shall no�t exceed , the sum o� three i 3� squ�r� ���'� per �` k"
<br />;=tt= . frant foot of building, plus one t]. ) square foot per ;
<br />�, � f ��
<br />"�' lineal front foot of lot area npt cavered by a bu�.lding, ' '� ,_,
<br />��L ��l ' , . . . � _ t.�.
<br />*S �
<br />j . �1
<br />kt u ��,
<br />+
<br />i�' "
<br />£ti'�5r . � , . . � . . S jt'
<br />�} � { ,
<br />� �' •';i
<br />�ti � . . ' . . . . . a
<br />}4 p Jql'
<br />�� t . 1 ii;�:
<br />„ tik
<br />t t N
<br />� � �1
<br />'j , � • � � � �:�\ 'i �
<br />.. .kj� 5 y � . � , � r 1
<br />, � 4 y + , . � � , , , . . ' � ( y � g
<br />i S { :z � . � . � . , . � '.7 f � � k �•ti�
<br />t t� r� i t 3.�N 4
<br />t Hi i r � t, t{ ukhl tfi� ���� �
<br />�S4 � �� �.`��� t �' � �� � ` 'ti. . e,., ac �,�p�� �C
<br />at�^ S:r n. �,�,.� �r _ _ i . ,, ;�,�• r� n ^A..�
<br />3,9;. .m6a!:.ci? �. �ir;3.. � .l.... . , . , . . � . . ,. . . , . . , . _ _ �4.9�: �"k*..
<br />
|