Laserfiche WebLink
. <br />C� <br />� <br />� <br />DATE: <br />TO: <br />FROM� <br />SU�.TECT : <br />M E M O R A N D U M <br />March 30, 1988 <br />. <br />Jim Andre <br />Craig A. Waldron <br />Modification of Plan ng Fees <br />Attached is an analysis tha�k I had Rick prepare, based ox� a <br />�urvey that Coon Rapids has recently completed. <br />We are depicting two basic alternatives. One invQlves a <br />moderate ir�crease, and the other, a more substantial incr�ase. <br />With either appxoach, i am recommending that the PUD and <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment be considered as separate items, <br />requiring, certain fees. P�esen�ly, th,ere is n� comprehensive <br />plan modifica�ion fee ar�d th� P.U. D, is folded in with the <br />special us�. Alternativ� � s�.ill keeps the cit� b�low �he <br />averag� �e�s charged in other �itieso The se�onc� alt�rnativ� <br />places Roseville over the average but does not exceed th� "high�� <br />o� any fees dep�c�ted. Alternative 1 would produce $13,875.(30, <br />while Alternativ� 2 should p�oduce �22,000.00. The curren� <br />�mount generated by tne existing iee structure is $6,30a.00. I <br />would suggest that this item be discussed fair].y soon at a work <br />session, as the city is ent�ring its peak phas� ir� terms of <br />planning activity. <br />