Laserfiche WebLink
�J <br />� <br />C� <br />DATE: <br />TO: <br />FROM. <br />SUBJECT: <br />M E M O R A N D U M <br />March 29, 1988 <br />Craig A. Waldron <br />Rick Jopke � <br />Zoning Fee Analysis <br />The following tables <br />fees. Table 1 is an attempteto a a1k analysis of zonin <br />fee su� e y z e t h e r e s u l t s � f a� related <br />y c o n d u c t e d by the city of Coon � R a p i d s i n Fe b planning <br />1988• 38 co m m u n i t i e s responded to the surve ruary of <br />It y' <br />�S �ifficult to draw <br />communities structure their fees� diffe er�tlabout fees <br />extremel because <br />y conservative view in Tab1e 1 to � I have taken an <br />average fees. In most cases attempt to compute <br />higher. Even with this conser�rativea a fees collected would be <br />are below average, pproach, Rosevilleis <br />fees <br />Tab1e 2 s�ows two alternative fee schedu <br />would be generated les and what revenue <br />applications wou�d be im lar to th se the <br />number and tYpe af <br />in 1987 (except as noted). <br />Finally, there a�e fees whzch we don't hav � <br />charging which could e which we could start <br />amendment generate additional revenue <br />, , shoreline, and PUD (i.e. com <br />m1gh� b,� generated if We added�these f esalso shows what revenue <br />