My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-02-23_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-02-23_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2016 1:51:13 PM
Creation date
2/18/2016 1:33:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/23/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT E <br />PRICE WORKSHEET <br />Instructions for Roseville RFP price worksheet <br />All proposers must fill out all eight proposal scenario price worksheets. In addition, proposers <br />also may complete an optional Additional alternate proposal scenario worksheet. Proposers may <br />submit multiple scenarios. <br />Proposers may fill in the attached form or use their own in similar formats. However, the <br />contents in the attached price worksheet must be included if alternative formats are submitted. <br />The basic revenue share formula outlined within this RFP can be summarized as a portion of the <br />Proposer's materials sales revenue from commodities less processing costs for these <br />commodities. Alternative revenue sharing formulae may be proposed. The City has a stated <br />preference for using the specified published indexes as a means to simplify the accounting of <br />proposed revenue share. Proposers can indicate from zero to 100 percent revenue share for <br />percent of published price index. Thus, vendors can opt out of the revenue share component by <br />simply inserting zero percent for the commodities for each scenario proposed. Alternate revenue <br />sharing formula can be proposed, but these must be clear with examples for each alternate <br />formula Also, vendors proposing alternate revenue sharing formula must justify how the <br />monitoring and accounting of the alternate formula will be at least as simple as the basic revenue <br />share formula contained within this RFP. <br />The City will use the assumed tonnage and material splits in Exhibit C for calculating the net <br />revenue share back to the City from all proposers. It is important to note that the City does not <br />guarantee any minimum tonnage or any specific material splits. These are estimates only for <br />purposes of this RFP and comparing the value of any revenue sharing proposals. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.