2016-03-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

398 Mr. Culver noted that the frequency question was intended to be built into the 399 upcoming 2016 community survey as well to inform the RFP; with options 400 included in the RFP for final deliberation and determination of the City Council. 401 402 Review of Last Month's Discussion 403 A brief review of last month's PWETC discuss ensued, including current and 404 proposed pick-up frequency and whether occurring between regular routes or at 405 an extra charge; possibility of more than one cart per home, but recognizing the 406 limited garage sizes and available storage space for many older Roseville single - 407 family homes; and city code requirements for stora ut-of-site. 408 409 Chair Stenlund sought clarification as to whether park pick-ups would be a 410 separate zone unto itself or embedded into one of the five existing zones. 411 412 Mr. Johnson responded that the RFP would include that option for contractors and 413 include routine pick-ups whether on' the trails requiring a smaller truck or 414 relocated by city staff to a central collection point depending on the park and/or 415 trail accessibility. 416 417 Member Wozniak notedthat the curren%contraActor esnot separate multi -family 418 zoning or collections. 419 420 Mr. Johnson reported that the rationale of Eureka Recycling is to keep those 421 multi -family collections separated from single-family units to allow tracking 422 materials to determine participation rates among various housing stock types. Mr. 423 Johnson noted that the city could not really stipulate whether or not a vendor 424 chose to keep that separation going forward. 425 426C�require ihacek opined that the city should not dictate that for contractors, nor 427 t a special trip be made for a designated pick-up point. However, 428 ihacek suggested the RFP should provide an opportunity for the vendor 429 to esce their preference or value added. 430 431 Mr. Culver also noted that for park pick-up, it required coordination of park 432 maintenancestaff with the contractor; but agreed that at the very start, the vendor 433 should sign e st effective way to accomplish pick-ups. 434 435 Specific to parks as a separate zone, Chair Stenlund clarified that he had no 436 problem with the current zoned collections, but was seeking to differentiate it 437 separately. 438 439 Mr. Johnson advised that he would clarify the RFP accordingly. 440 441 Specific to curbside collection of residential organics (pages 18-19), Member 442 Cihacek asked if the vendors would provide their options; with Mr. Johnson Page 10 of 20