My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-03-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-03-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2016 3:26:28 PM
Creation date
3/17/2016 3:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/22/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
352 From his perspective, Chair Stenlund asked Mr. Pasko for his opinion on why or how a <br />353 homeowner could be responsible for a portion of the line under the street and beyond his <br />354 right-of-way; and without any power on their part to control what occurs around or near <br />355 that line, such as compaction or traffic vibrations. Chair Stenlund also sought Mr. <br />356 Pasko's observations of other communities and their practice. <br />357 <br />358 Based on his experience across the country, Mr. Pasko advised that he was only <br />359 personally aware of one community that stops ownership at the property line or right -of - <br />360 way. Mr. Pasko advised that the responsibility of the owner usually went to the main and <br />361 includes the wye, with the private property owner responsible"for the lateral and Wye <br />362 connection that comes into the main to make it a complete pipe. Furthermore, Mr. Pasko <br />363 noted that it was common on the east coast for ownership of the Wye and lateral up to the <br />364 main. Mr. Pasko recognized that the wye was generally the first part to break. <br />365 <br />366 Mr. Pasko noted that the State of MN was actually progressive at a private property <br />367 owner didn't own water service to the main or half or all of the c top box; and <br />368 advised that many communities across the nation do so. <br />369 <br />370 Mr. Pasko opined that depending on the situations and technology to emp em, he <br />371 suspected that the use of cleanouts was coming to an end. Mr. Pasko noted t at it wasn't <br />372 unusual for private plumbers to carry liners into home basements or install cleanouts next <br />373 to the foundation wall but not in a right-of-way. <br />374 <br />375 Member Seigler asked if water laterals and linings had the same issues as that of sanitary <br />376 sewer lines as far as deterioration. <br />377 <br />378 While water mains were similar in terms of trouble spots and many can be rehabilitated <br />379 using similar technology, Mr. Pasko noted that it depended on the community and its type <br />380 of soil. Mr. Pasko advised that 30% to 60% of pipe wall loss was being experienced in <br />381 communities with 1920's era infrastructure. Mr. Pasko anticipated that in the next ten <br />382 years, technologies will be available allowing for water service pipes of 1/2" diameter to <br />383 be lined, once the materials used are certified; with some being experimented with now. <br />384 <br />385 Mr. Culver reported that S.E.H., Inc. will be designing and administering a Roseville <br />386 project lining the water main on Heinel Drive due to it being a long dead-end street and <br />387 creating difficulties for those residents if an open cut process was used. Mr. Culver <br />388 advised that this new technology for water main lining was different than the previous <br />389 pilot program using 3M spray -on material. <br />390 <br />391 On behalf of the PWETC, Chair Stenlund thanked Mr. Pasko for his informative <br />392 presentation and discussion. <br />393 <br />394 6. Roseville Recycling Request for Proposals (RFP) — continued from January <br />395 Mr. Culver referenced the staff report and attachments; highlighting specific items <br />396 remaining for PWETC recommendation. Mr. Culver also provided a summary of <br />397 the 60 comments and questions received via the Speak Up! Roseville website. <br />Page 9 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.