2016-01-06_PC_Agenda_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular Planning CommissionMeeting Minutes –Wednesday, December 2, 2015 Page 9 remediation or related matters, to avoid any potential conflict of interest, advised that on 401 caution’s side he would abstain from any action on this request. 402 C hair Boguszewski opened the public hearing for PLANNING FILE 15-024 at 7:36 p.m. 403 Senior Planner Bryan Lloyd provided a brief history of this request as detailed in the staff 404 report dated December 2, 2015.As outlined in the staff report, Mr. Lloyd noted the intent 405 of the applicant to develop a corporate headquarters, including indoor research and 406 development facilities, greenhouses, and up to five acres of outdoor research plots, as 407 the remaining uses were permitted.Mr. Lloyd noted the requested Conditional Use was 408 specific to that outdoor research and development use.Mr. Lloyd noted that the firm was 409 currently located in New Brighton, but was now growing sufficiently to seek this 410 expansion of their businesses. 411 As detailed in the staff report, Mr. Lloyd reviewed the Conditional Use criteria and staff’s 412 analysis of each component; and addressed the remainder outside city purview and 413 regulated by other regulatory agencies, as staff consulted with those agencies and 414 indicating no concerns to-date with the request. 415 Mr. Lloyd reported that staff had received no public comment to-date, and confirmed that 416 staff recommended approval of the Conditional Use as conditioned for the outdoor 417 research plots. 418 Discussion 419 Chair Boguszewski referenced Section 6 of Attachment C (applicant’s written narrative) 420 related to screening, and asked if there should be any reference to that screening as a 421 condition to the Conditional Use. 422 Mr. Lloyd responded that the Commission could choose to add a condition; however, 423 advised thatbuffering regulations in the city’s regulating plan would take effect along 424 Langton Lake Park boundaries and influence that screening.Also due to the proprietary 425 nature of the company’s research, Mr. Lloyd advised that the applicant had an interest in 426 obscuring those research plots from the public’s view, which staff had found to be 427 adequate. 428 Member Murphy noted Ramsey County’s property identification numbers (PIN’s) 429 compared to actual property boundaries being recommended for approval for the 430 applicant, and asked specifically what properties were under consideration for the 431 Conditional Use request and whether it applied only to those two properties defined by 432 those two PIN’s. 433 Mr. Lloyd clarified that this request was specific to the two parcels and several underlying 434 lots. At Member Murphy’s question as to the applicant’s intent to purchase additional lots, 435 Mr. Lloyd advised that while the applicant intended to purchase additional lots, the big 436 question for them is if they would be approved for the outdoortest plots.If that answer 437 from the Planning commission was yes, Mr. Lloyd advised that then they could proceed 438 with purchasing additional parcels.Mr. Lloyd further clarified that the plat may come 439 forward at a later point it was not now part of this request for the outdoor research plots. 440 Member Bull questioned staff’s conversation with the Department Agriculture on potential 441 problems with windblown dust to nearby residential areas when the applicant may spray. 442 Member Bull noted another concern may be odors from manure spreading across the 443 test fieldand if and how they would remediate that. 444 While admitting he was ill-equipped to know, Mr. Lloyd advised based on his 445 conversation with other regulating agencies, including the Department of Agriculture, that 446 any such application was regulated by them.As the City operates, Mr. Lloyd clarified that 447 this would not be under their active oversight, but that it would respond to any concerns 448 or complaints should something arise.However, how those chemicals were handled, Mr. 449 Lloyd advised he could not answer definitively.Mr. Lloyd noted that in an urban 450 environment, environmental regulations would prevent an application of significant 451