2016-01-06_PC_Agenda_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular Planning CommissionMeeting Minutes –Wednesday, December 2, 2015 Page 7 documents shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney, Public Works 300 Department, and Community Development Department.” 301 Ayes:6 302 Nays: 0 303 Motion carried. 304 For the benefit of the public, Member Murphy asked how questions were addressed and 305 answers conveyed if unable to be answered tonight. 306 Chair Boguszewski suggested it would be incumbent for staff or the City Council to 307 address those issues before their subsequent approval. 308 Mr. Paschke advised that, upon review of tonight’s draft meeting minutes, if additional 309 information was needed before the request moved forward to the City Council, staff 310 would doso and include them in their updated report to the City Council.Mr. Paschke 311 clarified that the City’s Planning and Engineering staff would continue their ongoing 312 review and monitoring of the development process. 313 At the request of Chair Boguszewski and for the benefit of the public, Mr. Paschke 314 advised that this request was tentatively scheduled for a City Council meeting agenda in 315 January of 2016. 316 b.PLANNING FILE 15-025 317 Request by United Properties, Inc., in conjunction with Roseville Area School 318 District No. 623 (property owners) for approval of a PRELIMINARY PLAT of 2659 319 Victoria Street 320 C hair Boguszewski opened the public hearing for PLANNING FILE 15-025 at:24p.m. 321 With this proposed action at tonight’s Planning Commission, Chair Boguszewski asked 322 staff to clarify whether ownership of this property had yet passed Independent School 323 District 623 to United Properties.Chair Boguszewski also sought clarification from staff 324 on the quorum needed for a vote on this request. 325 City Planner Paschke advised that the Purchase Agreement remained pending on 326 tonight’s preliminary plat approval, and was a multi-faceted project also involving city- 327 owned property.Mr. Paschke noted that part of the conditions of the Purchase 328 Agreement was having this preliminary plat in place in order to facilitate the sale of Lot 2, 329 the park property to the city, which was the main purpose of tonight’s requested action. 330 Mr. Paschke advised that a simple majority voteor 4 votes would be needed for this 331 proposed action. 332 Chair Boguszewski advised that as a member-elect to the I.S.D. 623 School Board, to 333 avoid a potential conflict of interest, he would participate in discussion and continue to 334 chair the meeting, but would abstain from voting on the request. 335 Member Murphy also advised that, as a member of the Board of Directors for a Senior 336 Cooperative property in Roseville with a continuing relationship with United Properties, he 337 would recuse himself from participating in this requested action, also to avoid any 338 potential conflict of interest. 339 City Planner Thomas Paschkeprovided a brief history of this request as detailed in staff 340 report, and based on staff’s analysis, reported that staff recommendedapproval of the 341 request. 342 Member Gitzen questioned if the City hadn’t at one point requested Lot 2 as an outlot. 343 Member Gitzen asked if it was subsequently sold, was it a buildable lot. 344 Mr. Paschke responded that actuallythe lot had originally been an outlot, but the City 345 requested it be changed to a lot as there was no need for it to remain an outlot.Mr. 346 Paschke advised that this lot was zoned and designated as park property; and if ever 347 sold would need to be reguided and rezoned accordingly from Park/Open Space to 348 accommodate any other type of development. 349