Laserfiche WebLink
RPWRTS <br />OSEVILLE UBLIC ORKSESPONSE TO RAFFIC TUDY <br />22 <br />According to the traffic study, no roadway network improvements are necessary for any development <br />23 <br />scenarios. Both scenarios will have an acceptable level of service at all intersections in the project <br />24 <br />area. <br />25 <br />Ramsey County is still reviewing the traffic study. <br />26 <br />OAC <br />THERGENCYOMMENT <br />27 <br />Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) controls the portion of Cleveland Avenue <br />28 <br />north of County Road B. MnDOTis not concerned about traffic from development in that <br />29 <br />location, but wouldwant to review asite planso that theycan comment on issues related to <br />30 <br />drainage, permitting, and noise. <br />31 <br />RA <br />ECOMMENDEDCTIONS <br />32 <br />By motion, make a recommendation to approve or denythe proposedComprehensive Land <br />33 <br />Use Plan map changeto re-designate propertyat 2025 County Road Bfrom LR to HR <br />, <br />34 <br />based on the comments and findings of this report,inputfrom the public hearing, and <br />35 <br />deliberation among the Commissioners. A successful motion to recommend approval of an <br />36 <br />amendment to the Comprehensive Plan requires a majority of at least 5/7ths of the Planning <br />37 <br />Commission.Despite the broad discretion of the City in making this kind of land use decision, a <br />38 <br />recommendation to deny should be supported by specific findings of fact based on the Planning <br />39 <br />Commission’s review of the application, applicable City Code regulations, and the public record. <br />40 <br />By motion, make a recommendation to approve or denythe proposedrezoning of the <br />41 <br />property at 2025 County Road B from LDR-1to HDR-1 <br />, based on the comments and findings <br />42 <br />of this report,inputfrom the public hearing,and the Commission’s recommendation about the <br />43 <br />requested CPA. <br />44 <br />AA <br />LTERNATIVE CTION <br />45 <br />Pass a motion to table the requestfor future action. <br />If the Planning Commission wishes to <br />46 <br />have additional information, discussion of the request can be further tabled to allow the applicant <br />47 <br />time to prepare such information. Tabling beyond April 30, 2016willrequire the applicant’s <br />48 <br />consent to further extendaction deadline establishedin Minn. Stat. §15.99. <br />49 <br />Attachments:A:January 6, 2016, RPCA Gracewood Traffic Study report <br />B: <br />packet and publichearing <br />minutes <br />Prepared by:SeniorPlanner Bryan Lloyd <br />651-792-7073 <br />bryan.lloyd@cityofroseville.com <br />PF16-001_RPCA_040616 <br />Page 2of 2 <br /> <br />