Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment A <br />ЊЍЌ <br />clarify versus narrative that may be up to interpretation, with staff?s feedback on ways to address those <br />ЊЍЍ <br />issues in the private/public sectors that made the most sense. <br />ЊЍЎ <br />Mr. Bilotta noted that the Terrace Drive area seemed to be primed for development at this time, with so far <br />ЊЍЏ <br />the only thing agreed upon is that the HDR zoning is not desired by anyone, meaning the only thing <br />ЊЍА <br />currently allowed for development is not desired. <br />ЊЍБ <br />Mr. Bilotta suggested staff be directed to engage the public in a series of public meetings starting within the <br />ЊЍВ <br />next three weeks in-house at the staff level, in an effort to provide guidance to the City Council; and for the <br />ЊЎЉ <br />other development area along County Road C, that developer use their consultants and finances to follow <br />ЊЎЊ <br />the same process in meeting with the neighbors to prepare a regulating plan or modify the Cunningham plan <br />ЊЎЋ <br />on the west side. <br />ЊЎЌ <br />Mayor Roe clarified that the design standards referenced by Councilmember McGehee were provided in <br />ЊЎЍ <br />Chapter 1005.02 of City Code. <br />ЊЎЎ <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke responded that the goal in developing that chapter of City Code was to <br />ЊЎЏ <br />eliminate regulating plans and adopt regional business standards and general requirements for the CMU <br />ЊЎА <br />District. <br />ЊЎБ <br />At the request of Mayor Roe, Mr. Paschke reviewed the options in extrapolating the Cunningham plan if <br />ЊЎВ <br />adopted by reference, similar to an amended PUD. <br />ЊЏЉ <br />Councilmember McGehee noted past discussions with Mr. Trudgeon and Mr. Paschke with the City Council <br />ЊЏЊ <br />related to subareas, with the City Council specifying the area around Langton Lake and the north side of <br />ЊЏЋ <br />Terrace Drive sees graduated intensity to provide protections. <br />ЊЏЌ <br />Mayor Roe also recognized that past discussion; however, he clarified that those subzones were meant to <br />ЊЏЍ <br />deal with adjacent areas in other ways, while this discussion was different. <br />ЊЏЎ <br />When the City Council initiated this discussion, Councilmember Willmus noted that it was changing HDR <br />ЊЏЏ <br />to CMU, with feedback heard provided by the business community and City Council before the <br />ЊЏА <br />neighborhood came forward in August seeking a voice in the process. Before moving forward and before <br />ЊЏБ <br />any other changes are considered, Councilmember Willmus noted the vital need to hear from them and bring <br />ЊЏВ <br />them into the process. Based on what he had heard to-date from the neighbors, Councilmember Willmus <br />ЊАЉ <br />opined that he wasn't confident that CMU was the vision they had for their neighborhood, and before formal <br />ЊАЊ <br />action by the City Council, those conversations needed to be part of the process. <br />ЊАЋ <br />Councilmember McGehee clarified that this was the proposal made by Mr. Bilotta for staff to initiate that <br />ЊАЌ <br />discussion with the neighborhood over the next three weeks. <br />ЊАЍ <br />At the request of Mayor Roe, Mr. Bilotta advised that as long as the discussions were held in-house, staff <br />ЊАЎ <br />required no formal action from the City Council; but if it was determined that an outside consultant was <br />ЊАЏ <br />required, they would return to the City Council for their authorization. Mr. Bilotta opined that, as long as <br />ЊАА <br />the discussion was within the Terrace Drive area, and not further beyond to Cleveland Avenue, staff could <br />ЊАБ <br />handle the meeting process. <br />ЊАВ <br />Mr. Bilotta and Mr. Paschke clarified that a regulating plan was required, but could be done by the City or <br />ЊБЉ <br />the developer and created by area; and by consensus of the City Council agreed that a regulating plan <br />ЊБЊ <br />developed by the private sector would be amendable to the City Council for consideration as well. <br />ЊБЋ <br />Regarding whether to use a regulatory plan or another option, Councilmember Etten opined that it seemed <br />ЊБЌ <br />the regulatory plan allowed flexibility, and in previous discussion when considering creating subzones as <br />ЊБЍ <br />applicable, another part of that discussion was to simply leave it open, providing enough nuance without <br />ЊБЎ <br />changing all zoning. Councilmember Etten stated that he was in favor of the open zoning as long as it could <br />ЊБЏ <br />be adjusted through a regulating plan. <br /> <br />