2014-10-08_PC_Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment A ЊБА Mr. Bilotta confirmed that a regulating plan allowed some flexibility, a graphic regulatory tool would ЊББ address those pieces, including no build areas, future roadways, areas of lower intensity, different ЊБВ impervious surface percentages closer to the lake and other pieces. ЊВЉ Specific to the Interim Use discussion, Councilmember Laliberte agreed with Councilmember Willmus on ЊВЊ the check-back option; questioning ramifications if that option was removed not only for this City Council ЊВЋ but future Council’s as well. ЊВЌ Mayor Roe suggested language could be included for that five year - or more - check-back or a statement ЊВЍ related to renewal terms of an Interim Use. ЊВЎ Mr. Bilotta thanked the City Council for their input, and advised staff would proceed to the Planning ЊВЏ Commission for their deliberation and subsequent recommendation to the City Council. ЊВА Councilmember Laliberte noted that the Metropolitan Council was still requiring cities to increase their ЊВБ housing density, and questioned if the City or Roseville would still be in compliance with this direction. ЊВВ Councilmember Willmus noted that CMU could still include housing as part of that mix. ЋЉЉ Mayor Roe clarified that the Metropolitan Council was not requiring housing density, but simply projecting ЋЉЊ it. ЋЉЋ Mr. Paschke noted recent residential developments not yet identified by the Metropolitan Council, as well as ЋЉЌ several in the planning stages, that will provide credits for the City of Roseville in meeting those ЋЉЍ projections. ЋЉЎ At approximately 7:06 p.m., Mayor Roe opened the discussion up to public comment related to these issues. ЋЉЏ Public Comment ЋЉА Vicky Boyer, Centennial Drive ЋЉБ Ms. Boyer expressed her appreciation of the City Council in hearing public comments, opining that it made ЋЉВ her feel more comfortable with planning going forward with input from the neighborhood. ЋЊЉ Mayor Roe thanked Ms. Boyer for her positive feedback regarding how the City Council was approaching ЋЊЊ this. ЋЊЋ Lisa McCormick, ЋЊЌ Ms. McCormick sought clarification on her understanding on current City Code for the Vogel Interim Use ЋЊЍ for five years, with optional renewal(s), which was confirmed by Mayor Roe. ЋЊЎ After listening to tonight?s discussion, Ms. McCormick expressed some concern and asked for caution from ЋЊЏ the City Council in dealing with nonconforming uses. While appreciating looking at the overarching vision, ЋЊА Ms. McCormick asked if there was a process in place for the City to monitor tenants and potential turnover, ЋЊБ to determine if a tenant will be intensifying a use. ЋЊВ Mr. Bilotta responded that as far as a formal process, this could become known through initiation of a ЋЋЉ building permit; and form a planning perspective, a formal review could be initiated as well for certain ЋЋЊ improvements. However, if a business steps into another space without any improvements, it was unlikely ЋЋЋ that the City would be aware of that beyond filing of complaints for potential noncompliance. Mr. Bilotta ЋЋЌ advised that staff was increasing their due diligence with property owners to make sure they alert City Hall ЋЋЍ of any increased intensity in uses from one tenant to another. In response to Ms. McCormick, Mr. Bilotta ЋЋЎ advised that expanding a nonconforming use would not be allowed and would not make it through a ЋЋЏ building permit process. ЋЋА Ms. McCormick noted the e-mail she’d written the City Council earlier, and had no concerns beyond that, ЋЋБ other than expressing her concerns with the next issue in considering waiving of EAW?s. ЋЋВ David Vogel, Vogel Sheetmetal