My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0418
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0418
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2016 9:46:58 AM
Creation date
4/26/2016 9:45:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/18/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, April 18, 2016 <br />Page 10 <br />Councilmember Etten agreed with the need for some caution and tuning, but also <br />expressed his interest in training people to use their expertise. Councilmember <br />Etten agreed that there was no desire to lose programming, but opined that it <br />would also be good to use younger trainees at a reduced versus more competitive <br />cost. <br />Councilmember McGehee stated that, if you have trained staff and not enough <br />programming on view, it would be nice for youth and adult trainees to bring for- <br />ward some ideas of their own (e.g. Karen population), opining she could think of <br />a number of educational, civic things that could be done but couldn't be done by a <br />freelance or consulting videographer needing to be paid market rates. Coun- <br />cilmember McGehee opined that there were a number of non -profits needing such <br />services but were unable to afford them. However, if they were able to do so at <br />reasonable rates, Councilmember McGehee spoke in support of it provided <br />enough interested trainees were available and were experienced enough that a <br />non-profit was willing to pay a reduced rate for such services. <br />Councilmember Etten noted that there was a considerable amount of free pro- <br />gramming sent in by groups, most volunteering their time, and suggested there <br />may not actually be a huge revenue source for CTV staff since volunteers enjoy <br />producing things on their own schedules. Councilmember Etten opined this indi- <br />cated outside groups could then provide material as well as others working to- <br />gether for free to produce programming. <br />Mayor Roe noted this discussion reflected similar internal CTV Board of Direc- <br />tors conversations about concerns about competing with the private sector and the <br />other end of the spectrum in the desire to provide services to non -profits needing <br />programming services. <br />Ms. Raye also noted that that discussion had come up in her visits with other <br />member cities as well. While the interest is there that production content would <br />be helpful to specialized populations and/or non -profits, Ms. Raye also noted <br />many things in common among member cities that would provide good topics of <br />interest for the viewing public (e.g. environmental and water quality issues) and <br />providing opportunities for collaborative efforts. <br />Mayor Roe concurred, referencing watershed districts as one example of shared <br />interests. <br />As a second question related to the CTV budget, Ms. Raye asked if the City of <br />Roseville was satisfied with the level of budget transparency and information, <br />frequency of the inforination, and the detail of that financial transparency as it re- <br />lated to programming and budgeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.