My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0418
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0418
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2016 9:46:58 AM
Creation date
4/26/2016 9:45:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/18/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, April 18, 2016 <br />Page 17 <br />City Manager Trudgeon noted this priority would be discussed further as the next <br />agenda item. Mr. Trudgeon opined that some of the dates in the timeline shown <br />in the update may be somewhat aggressive, and suggested the City Council may <br />wish to consider a Special City Council Meeting or separate Economic Develop- <br />ment Authority (EDA) meeting in May beyond a regular meeting to allow more <br />intense discussion over the next six weeks. <br />C. Discuss Roseville Economic Development Strategy — Phase I <br />Mayor Roe recognized Interim Community Development Director Kari Collins, <br />who in turn introduced Ms. Janna King, recently hired as an Economic Develop- <br />ment consultant to the city specific to review economic development needs for the <br />city. <br />Janna King, Economic Development Services, Inc. <br />Ms. King stated that the first place to address potential development of strategies <br />to help navigate is to start by listening to the City Council and their individual and <br />corporate ideas. Ms. King referenced a bench handout provided and attached to <br />this RCA providing examples of other communities and sharing of fiscal implica- <br />tions of particular development types and ways to influence tax density in a com- <br />munity. Ms. King suggested this may help the city get a handle on the budget if <br />particularly interesting or adaptable programs appealed to them. <br />Ms. King noted that this process and discussion is intentionally tied into the City <br />of Roseville's budget process, and reviewed the steps she had taken to -date in- <br />cluding a citywide tour with staff last week. <br />Ms. King provided a discussion guide (Attachment A) for this Phase I scope that <br />asked a series of questions for response by the City Council. <br />What do you think are the three most important economic development is- <br />sues or opportunities for Roseville over the next 18 months? <br />Councilmember Etten <br />Councilmember Etten stated the three areas lagging and needing revitalization <br />from his perspective were: <br />1) SE Roseville in addition to west along Larpenteur Avenue and north along <br />Rice Street where housing and businesses are not at the same level as other ar- <br />eas in Roseville. <br />2) Positive clean-up or redevelopment of brownfields outside the Twin Lakes <br />Redevelopment Area; and identifying other ways to encourage a positive <br />turnover and use for those areas by upgrading them for the benefit of the <br />community. <br />3) Investment in housing stock throughout the community, noting a number of <br />programs developed and used by the former Housing & Redevelopment Au- <br />thority (HRA), recognizing the need to continue encouraging investments and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.