CC_Minutes_2016_0411 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, April ll, 2016 Page 27 Roll Call Ayes: McGehee, Willmus, Laliberte, Etten and Roe. Nays: None. Recess Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 8:55 p.m., and reconvened at approximately 9:02 p.m. b. Authorize Entering into a Professional Services Contract with Economic De- velopment Consultant Interim Community Development Director Kari Collins reviewed staffls recom- inendation for a contract with Economic Development Services, Inc. as detailed in the RCA dated April 11, 2016. Ms. Collins noted inclusion in the agenda packet of a biography with Ms. King's expertise and credentials. Ms. Collins noted that Ms. King was also a Roseville resident. McGehee moved, Willmus seconded, authorizing entering into a Professional Services Contract for Economic Development services with Economic Develop- ment Services, Inc. for preparation of a Phase I Economic Development Strategy; and authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute the document. Councihnember Laliberte spoke in support of this motion, but for the purposes of full disclosure and noting that Ms. King is a resident of Roseville, advised that Ms. King was also a resident in her direct neighborhood. While having no direct connection to her business, Councihnember Laliberte sought to make that clear. Roll Call Ayes: McGehee, Willmus, Laliberte, Etten and Roe. Nays: None. c. Recycling Request for Proposals (RFP) Public Worlcs Director Marc Culver reviewed this request for City Council ap- proval of the draft Request for Proposals (RFP) for a new curbside recycling con- tract for the City of Roseville, as detailed in the RCA dated April 11, 2016 and re- lated attachments. As part of his review and presentation materials as made available to the Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission at their February 2016 monthly meeting, Mr. Culver provided comparisons with the current contract and this proposed RFP. At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Culver clarified that costs and av- erages in the current Eureka contract were offset by expected revenue and didn't include actual costs for that buy-down.