CC_Minutes_2016_0411 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, Apri111, 2016 Page 9 Mayor Roe clarified that during the process, inany things were happening and be- ing completed by multiple entities, and suggested it was better not to identify an- yone at all, since the City Council had final approval via adoption of the ordi- nance. Councilmember McGehee agreed with Mayor Roe's clarification; and no changes were made to staff's draft language (page 11). However, Councilmember McGe- hee reiterated that her attempt was to make Items 3.a and d parallel so the Coin- munity Development Departinent would generate the analysis instead of only ad- dressing it as Item 2.g on page 10. From his perspective, and without objection from his other colleagues, Mayor Roe stated that the preambles are fine and served to get the point across. Page 12, Item 2.i, Lines 361-366 Councilmember McGehee reviewed her proposed language as noted; with Mayor Roe suggesting "must include" in the sentence. City Attorney Gaughan noted that the language for this provision was intended to put the onus on the owner of the lands and building, thus its particular wording. After further discussion, without objection, and upon input and recommendation of the City Attorney, language as submitted in staff's draft reinained unchanged for lines 361 — 365. Pa�e 13, Item 3.f, Line 388 Councilmember McGehee noted that this proposed change from her was similar to those addressed in lines 330 and 332 that hadn't been changed. Without objection, Mayor Roe ruled no changes for this language either. Pa�e 15, Item A, Existing PUD Overlay Districts, Lines 429 — 436 Councilmember McGehee stated her intent to assign the duty — as on page 13 as referenced above — that the Community Development Department "shall" estab- lish... Specific to administrative amendinents, Mayor Roe asked if the City Council wanted to have notice of soinething being changed that wouldn't typically fall within the purview of the City Council. Councilmember Etten opined that at some point, staff would end up tied in cir- cles, and unable to move forward, essentially grinding development to a halt if all review needed to come before the City Council in addition to staff.