2015-10-07_PC_Agenda_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment A and addressing where responsibilities lie and where final decisions were made; and whether current staffing or a different staffing model was indicated as part of the process moving forward. City Manager Trudgeon thanked Councilmember Willmus for bringing the Tree Board to his attention; noting they did not currently have a direct role in reviewing tree preservation, which was often tied to development. However, Mr. Trudgeon noted the need to include their perspective related to shade trees, pests, and boulevard issues; and noted the need to reconcile their role with this discussion. Mayor Roe opined that the City's first attempt at a tree preservation ordinance was good, but now it was time to refine it. As noted by Councilmember Etten and the discussion held in November of 2014, Mayor Roe opined that fairly reflected the thoughts of the City Council, and while there may be a difference of opinion among individual Councilmembers about ultimate triggers, the policy decision needed to be made. Mayor Roe indicated that to begin that process, a draft ordinance would provide something for the City Council to respond to, while hoping tonight's input had provided some parameter within which to start that work. Mr. Gozola thanked the City Council for their overall direction, noting he was not hearing anything to indicate the points already pointed out were not out-of-line or off-base, but still grounded in what the City hoped to accomplish. Mr. Gozola thanked Planning Commissioners for their input as well; and expressed his interest in bringing all boards and departments into the consultation process. Since this is the first introductory meeting held, Mr. Gozola noted next steps would be to review this discussion with staff, define a cost to develop an ordinance, with nothing signed to-date; and bringing that proposal back to the City Council with a plan about how to get the city where they thought they wanted to go. Mayor Roe opined that the preservation areas provided an interesting concept (e.g. Acorn Road) that may indicate different replacement rates, as well as credits for off-site replacement and/or tree "banking," all of which he found worthy to look at. Mayor Roe opined that the "cash in lieu of" for trees could fund those wanting to put up a tree and the ability to do so at a reduced cost, offering his interest in looking at that concept. Based on earlier comments and what additional information was needed, Councilmember Laliberte noted the need to have all departments aligned and working together. Recognizing the position for a Forester posted earlier this year, Councilmember Laliberte noted the need to hear more options: whether a staff position was preferable, or an outside consultant or business; or whether the City's role was to get involved in the business or identifying good or bad trees beyond disease issues (e.g. EAB) to avoid being seen as "tree snobs." Along those lines of good or bad trees, Councilmember McGehee noted the need to avoid encouraging planting of noxious invasive trees, but also providing a general list of trees that differentiated between native or non-native plantings rather than trying to define all tree species; but only those not serving to encroach further.