Laserfiche WebLink
PO <br />ROPOSALVERVIEW <br />9 <br />The applicant proposes to rezone the parcel from High-Density Residential-1 (HDR-1) to High- <br />10 <br />Density Residential-2 (HDR-2) to allow construction of a 62-unit, 3-story senior living facility. <br />11 <br />The project narrative and conceptual site plan are included with this report as Attachment D. <br />12 <br />When exercising the City’s legislative authority on a rezoning request, the role of the City is to <br />13 <br />review the proposal for its merits and to evaluate the potential impacts to the public health, <br />14 <br />safety, and general welfare of the community. If a rezoning request is found to be consistent with <br />15 <br />the Comprehensive Plan and is otherwise a desirable proposal, the City may still deny the <br />16 <br />rezoning request if the proposal fails to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare. <br />17 <br />RA <br />EZONING NALYSIS <br />18 <br />The subject property is guided by the Comprehensive Plan for High-Density Residential (HR) <br />19 <br />land uses. This use generally allows multi-family housing types (such as apartments, lofts, flats, <br />20 <br />and stacked townhomes) and accommodates an overall density greater than 12 units per acre. <br />21 <br />The proposed HDR-2 District was established to facilitate development consistent with the HR <br />22 <br />designation by providing: <br />23 <br />An environment of predominantly high-density housing types, including manufactured- <br />24 <br />home communities, large and small multi-family buildings, and single-family attached <br />25 <br />dwellings at an overall density exceeding 12 units per acre, along with related uses such <br />26 <br />as public services and utilities that serve the residents in the district. The district is <br />27 <br />intended to promote flexible development standards for new residential developments <br />28 <br />and to allow innovative development patterns, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />29 <br />City Code §1004.11 <br />30 <br />The applicant’s proposal to rezone to HDR-2 is predicated on a 62-unit senior housing project <br />31 <br />that includes a mix of one-bedroom (60%) and two-bedroom (40%) units within a roughly 35- <br />32 <br />foot-tall building. Under the HDR-1 classification, the 1.79 acre site supports a maximum of 43 <br />33 <br />units (24 units/acre x 1.79 acres), while the HDR-2 classification has a minimum density of 24 <br />34 <br />units per acre and no maximum density limit. The proposal by Good Samaritan Society works <br />35 <br />out to 34.5 units per acre. <br />36 <br />Unlike other processes that the Planning Commission considers, a rezoning request cannot place <br />37 <br />a condition on the rezoning request that limits the future development of the parcel to that which <br />38 <br />the applicant has indicated. In instances where a high density residential development is <br />39 <br />proposed, the City often studies the potential traffic to be generated, because a change in the <br />40 <br />zoning would allow Good Samaritan or another developer the ability to maximize the site’s <br />41 <br />density potential assuming all requirements of the City Code can be met. In the case of the <br />42 <br />Good Samaritan proposal, SRF Consulting Group was hired by the Public Works Department to <br />43 <br />study two scenarios: <br />44 <br />1.The proposed 62-unit senior housing project. <br />45 <br />2.250 units, which is deemed the maximum number of units a developer could construct on <br />46 <br />the site given City design standard limitations. <br />47 <br />PF16-006_RPCA_050416 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />