2016-05-04_PC_Agenda_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

According to the traffic study (Attachment C), overall operations at all intersections in the study 48 area will operate under the acceptable level of service A (LOS), and no roadway network 49 improvements are necessary for the 62-unit development. If the higher density residential 50 scenario is developed, Ramsey County would consider adding a right-turn lane at Albert Street 51 for west bound traffic on County Road B since this turning movement increases. A shared 52 access to the existing Rose Mall apartments should also be considered to reduce conflict points. 53 Because the HDR-1 and HDR-2 districts were created as the two zoning districts meant to be 54 compatible with the HR designation in the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Division staff 55 finds that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the guidance of the Comprehensive Plan. 56 PC UBLICOMMENT 57 The required open house meeting for this proposal was held by the applicant on January 14, 58 2016. A summary of the discussion at the meeting is included with this report in Attachment E. 59 RA ECOMMENDEDCTIONS 60 By motion, recommend approval of the proposed rezoning of Ramsey County PIN 10-29-23- 61 34-0006 from HDR-1 to HDR-2 based on the comments and findings of this report. 62 AA LTERNATIVECTIONS 63 Pass a motion to table the application for future action. Tabling the rezoning would require 64 extension of the 60-day action deadline established in Minn. Stat. 15.99. 65 By motion, recommend denial of the request. A recommendation to deny the application 66 should be supported by specific findings of fact based on the Planning Commission’s review of 67 the application, applicable City Code regulations, and the public record. 68 Prepared by Thomas Paschke, City Planner, 651-792-7074 thomas.paschke@cityofroseville.com Attachments: A: Area map D: Concept plan and narrative Aerial photo E: Open house information and public B: Traffic study comment C: PF16-006_RPCA_050416 Page 3 of 3