CC_Minutes_2016_0509 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, May 9, 2016 Page 16 Specific to fee monies, staff provided some discussion points for how to best use replacement tree funds. • Utilize within a two-year timeframe • Keep expenditures within the general development area • Tie tree replacement outside the development project site to a public im- provement project • Review and approval of expenditures of tree replacement fund dollars by the City Council Councilmember Etten questioned if funds should be allotted to the city's Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) replacement program, either for replacement and/or treatment. As an example, Councilmember Etten noted the treatment options being used for trees on the golf course to prevent them becoming infested, thankfully resulting in them remaining healthy to-date. Councilmeinber Etten wondered if some amount of the fees could be used for such treatments in other areas. Councilmember McGehee stated her lack of excitement to utilize fees as part of the EAB prevention injection program. However, Councilmember McGehee agreed that the fund could and should be used for replacement of trees that had become diseased and removed, that could result in replacing trees with larger sized trees than normal budget funds inay allow, and as staff defined areas of need. Mayor Roe suggested in staff's bullet point: "Tie tree replacement outside the de- velopment project site to a public improvement project;" language be included to tie it to a public improvement project "or diseased tree replacement." However, Mayor Roe cautioned care in not having an "either/or" option, but establishing a priority process. Councilmember Etten suggested the points be considered ad "guiding principles." Mayor Roe agreed on the need to word the language to make sense accordingly. Councilmember McGehee spoke in support of the great ideas, but noted some en- hancement was needed that staff would provide when bringing the document back before the City Council. Councilmember McGehee thanked staff for providing the basis of the work for this new policy. Mayor Roe asked if the City Council had a preference for one or more of its advi- sory commissions to review this proposed policy and their recommendations to the City Council (e.g. Public Works, Environment and Transportation and/or Parks Commission — in their role as the Tree Board).