My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0516
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2016 9:08:10 AM
Creation date
5/25/2016 8:09:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, May 16, 2016 <br />Page 21 <br />great opportunity to have a united voice on some of those issues that inform the <br />broader comprehensive plan process. <br />Polity Priority Planning (PPP) Initiatives <br />Housin� / Economic Development & Infrastructure Sustainability <br />SE Roseville Engagement <br />City Manager Trudgeon briefly reviewed these initiatives as previously discussed <br />as part of the PPP document and process. <br />Councilmember Willmus spoke in support of partnering with SE Roseville hous- <br />ing developers, whether AEON or Common Bond or both, to proactively come up <br />with solutions. Councilmember Willmus admitted that may take dollars, a viable <br />plan, or some other type of participation by the City of Roseville. <br />Housinp� and Economic Development Staffing Pro rg ams <br />City Manager Trudgeon advised that staff was going through the process now, <br />and would be providing recommendations in the near future to continue moving <br />forward; whether that involved program or staffing changes, or hiring of outside <br />consultants. <br />Investment in Infrastructure <br />City Manager Trudgeon noted that investment in infrastructure was ongoing and <br />important; and ultimately embedded in all the other areas. <br />City Council Input about Initiatives <br />City Manager Trudgeon sought input from the City Council in general about these <br />proposed organizational priorities and initiatives; or things that were not being <br />addressed that should be. <br />Specific to various and overall technologies, Councilmember Laliberte noted the <br />need to pay attention to that, since the city had invested in various software pro- <br />grams to-date that didn't work across the organization and/or with other software <br />programs. Councilmember Laliberte stated that it would be helpful to her to have <br />a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of those existing technolo- <br />gies and software systems; and what is needed to fix the gaps and make them <br />more consistent. <br />City Manager Trudgeon responded that this was certainly an important issue and <br />needed further discussion internally and at the city council level throughout the <br />remainder of the year. Mr. Trudgeon stated he anticipated that staff would be <br />prepared to discuss that in more detail, but advised that they had not felt comfort- <br />able in doing so at this time without having additional answers available. Mr. <br />Trudgeon noted that all city departments struggled with this on a day-to-day basis; <br />including how to better allocate dollars to IT and communicate better among <br />those systems rather than having to resort to paper methods. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.