My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0516
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2016 9:08:10 AM
Creation date
5/25/2016 8:09:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, May 16, 2016 <br />Page 22 <br />As part of that due diligence, Councilmember McGehee suggested looking into <br />the LOGIS system as a potential model, used in the SE metropolitan area with <br />overarching groups of municipalities belonging and a software group coordinating <br />different packages including state reporting requirements built into. <br />Mayor Roe noted a pretty significant discussion in last year's budget discussion of <br />the park area and facility CIP needs; with staff tasked to bring a plan forward. <br />Mayor Roe reminded staff to make sure that was on the radar screen early on in <br />the process as directed by the City Council for a conjoined discussion versus a <br />disjointed one on timing for that issue. Mayor stated his interest in seeing how <br />that goes forward and tying it into the policy related to park dedication fees and <br />use of the remaining funds from the Park Renewal Program. Mayor Roe noted <br />the need to incorporate that with other areas in the CIP and identifying other fund- <br />ing sources for those CIP needs as part of that broader discussion. <br />Councilmember McGehee opined that the city had done a fairly good job looking <br />at contract services; but suggested continued diligence in more guidelines or ways <br />to plug in shared service opportunities. <br />Councilmember Etten expressed his appreciation for this collaborative process. <br />While he may miss the detailed information provide from specific departments, <br />Councilmember Etten stated his preference for this unified staff approach evolv- <br />ing from past territorial requests or "silo" thinking. Councilmember Etten opined <br />this was a great move for the city and thanked City Manager Trudgeon for im- <br />plementing the process. <br />Councilmember McGehee also thanked City Manager Trudgeon for getting this <br />process on board and making it happen; noting elimination of the silos was a top <br />priority of the City Council. <br />Councilmember consensus was to get the elderly demographic back in the pro- <br />cess. <br />City Manager Trudgeon reviewed various budget impacts for 2017 as noted in the <br />presentation; 2017 budget cost savings; potentia120171evy cost savings and other <br />components of the budget process. <br />City Manager Trudgeon asked if there was anything missing before the July 18, <br />2016 presentation of the City Manager-recommended 2017 budget. <br />Mayor Roe noted the missing details mentioned by Councilmember Etten, asking <br />that staff preliminarily plug those in between now and the next iteration, recogniz- <br />ing they will not represent final numbers, but will serve to help inform the pro- <br />cess. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.