My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0516
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2016 9:08:10 AM
Creation date
5/25/2016 8:09:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, May 16, 2016 <br />Page 7 <br />City Manager Trudgeon noted this resulted in each department head bringing <br />forward five organization-wide priorities based on those documents and what they <br />perceived to be the organization-wide needs. With this broader process, Mr. <br />Trudgeon reported that those submissions led to thirty-five different ideas on what <br />priorities should be included in the 2017 budget; with department heads subse- <br />quently meeting to regroup those priorities into five larger categories as submit- <br />ted. Mr. Trudgeon advised that this exercise served to strengthen relationships <br />among departments for allocation of financial resources, and contrasted with past <br />independent departmental budget cycles rather than this citywide viewpoint. Mr. <br />Trudgeon noted this provided a sense of organizational priorities and allowed <br />management staff to evolve out of past department-centric formats to move to- <br />ward this new organization-wide priority-driven frameworlc. <br />City Manager Trudgeon advised that this first look was not intended to define <br />costs, but allow a broader discussion of the merits of proposed initiatives; with <br />costs coming forward for those approved priorities as part of the subsequent pro- <br />cess, including other funding sources and new levy dollars. While there may be a <br />desire to talk specifics and better understand financial ramifications, Mr. Trudg- <br />eon aslced Councilmembers to recognize that this initial discussion is only the <br />start of the process. <br />City Manager Trudgeon advised that each department head was available tonight, <br />and would participate in and weigh in on organizational priorities, hopefully cre- <br />ating a free-flowing discussion. As part of the process, Mr. Tnidgeon advised that <br />other budget impact items and a proposed process calendar were included for <br />feedback from the City Council tonight as well. <br />City Manager Tnidgeon introduced the presentation, showing the initial priorities <br />and the five areas subsequently identified by city staff, as detailed in the Request <br />for Council Action dated May 16, 2016, with specific items addressed under each <br />priority with an overview of each initiative by individual department heads, fol- <br />lowed by Councilmember and staff discussion. <br />Crime Reduction / Safetv Items <br />Mental Health Liaison Officer <br />Police Chief Rick Mathwi� reviewed the intent of this proposed new position and <br />rationale for department heads agreeing to and seeing it as a priority. <br />Councilmember McGehee pointed out that, within the metropolitan area and ex- <br />tending as far as Rochester, NIN, there were no beds or psychiatric appointments <br />available. While this position may be a good thing, Councilmember McGehee <br />opined we as a state had failed, and since services aren't available for a significant <br />number of people, with an estimated 30% to 40% of those incarcerated in correc- <br />tional institutions having mental health issues, that needed to be kept in mind with <br />this request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.