Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, May 23, 2016 <br />Page 9 <br />a. Public Hearing to Approve/DENY an On-Sale 3.2% Non-Intoxicating Liquor <br />Lacense for HR LLC, d/b/a Home 2 Suites Roseville, a Hotel located at 2020 <br />Iona Lane <br />Finance Director Chris Miller provided a brief suininary of this request, and pur- <br />pose of the public hearing to hear public comment on the application. Mr. Miller <br />advised that staff had reviewed all application materials and found then:i to be <br />complete; and noted staff was currently performing background checks for man- <br />agers of the facility. <br />Mayor Roe opened and closed the public hearing at approximately 6:52 with no <br />one appearing for or against. <br />Mayor Roe noted the applicant was not present in the audience. <br />McGehee moved, Willmus seconded, approval of an On-Sale 3.2% Non- <br />Intoxicating Liquor License for HR LLC, d/b/a Home 2 Suites Roseville, a Hotel <br />located at 2020 Iona Lane; pending completion of criminal background checks; <br />and effective fo� a te�m December 31, 2016. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee, and Roe. <br />Nays: None. <br />13. Budget Items <br />14. Business Items (Action Items) <br />a. Request for Approval to REZONE the Property at 1415 County Road B <br />from High Density Residential-1 (HDR-1) to High Density Residential-2 <br />(HDR-2) District <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed this rezoning request by Good Samaritan <br />Society as detailed in the RCA for their owned parcel at Albert Street and County <br />Road B, in the proximity of Target One, Perkins Restaurant and TCF Banlc. <br />Mr. Paschke noted that the request was precipitated on the applicant's desire for a <br />62-unit senior affordable housing facility that wouldn't work on the property giv- <br />en current size requirements under HDR-1 zoning. Mr. Paschke noted that this <br />project, to be financial feasible, required a greater density to achieve. Mr. <br />Paschke advised that he had plans available for the proposed project, but clarified <br />that they were not part of this rezoning consideration. Mr. Paschke noted the <br />Planning Commission had unanimously recommended approval, along with <br />staff's recommendation for approval. <br />