My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0613
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2016 2:38:29 PM
Creation date
6/24/2016 3:46:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 13, 2016 <br />Page 23 <br />districts thereby not allowing significant changes to be noticed and vetted by <br />neighborhoods being affected by the corresponding changes as proposed. With- <br />out an opportunity for those neighborhoods or community areas to review those <br />sections and goals, or to voice their concerns, Councilmember McGehee opined <br />that negated ownership by those neighborhoods in the process. Otherwise, Coun- <br />cilmember McGehee opined that she thought the sections, goals and overall vision <br />was good, but it simply lacked that necessary outreach component and engage- <br />-- -- - —_ ---- <br />ment at the level neighborhood and community within the city for the whole plan. <br />Specific to the scope of the update, Councilmember McGehee stated that only a <br />few technical updates were needed due mostly to legislative changes since 2008. <br />Councilmember McGehee opined that the vision was fine, but the vision was be- <br />fore the new normal; and it didn't hurt in this process to take that vision back to <br />smaller neighborhoods to take their pulse and malce sure everything was still rele- <br />vant. <br />Councilmember Willmus stated that he agreed with much of Councilmember <br />McGehee's comments, opining he found it to be a good document and didn't re- <br />quire a rewrite or complete revision, but to simply look to the technical update to <br />make sure a review of goals are still relevant to accomplish, those no longer valid, <br />or those needing new things plugged in. Councilmember Willmus noted he in- <br />cluded bringing the EDA into it. Councilmember Willmus stated that one thing <br />he would like to consider bringing bacic into the focus of the coinprehensive plan, <br />was a review of the vision, goals and policies related to HDR housing, and to take <br />a second loolc at that based on recent presentations and former Community De- <br />velopment Director Bilotta's report on the amount of Roseville acreage zoned <br />HDR versus what the community needs. <br />Councilmeinber Etten stated he would support a middle-of-the-road approach, or <br />option "b' with a technical and content update. Councilmeinber Etten suggested <br />some areas needing more time spend on them included housing and economic de- <br />velopment; and expressed appreciation for Public Works Director Culver's intent <br />to provide connectivity with the community's Pathway Master Plan, and suggest- <br />ed including that connectivity outside the city or regionally as well. Also as the <br />city moves forward in reviewing development proposals, Councilmember Etten <br />suggested a more in-depth look, form a public works or parks and recreation per- <br />spective, how those pieces connect (e.g. water, climate, health, etc.) and consider <br />them part of the comprefiensive plan as well. <br />Councilmember Laliberte stated her agreement with her colleagues for the most <br />part, noting that the City Council and community had been addressing those areas <br />of the 2008 plan that didn't seem right or needed refinement over the last few <br />years. Regarding the scope, Councilmember Laliberte supported option "b" to <br />make sure the updated plan was current. Councilmember Laliberte agreed that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.